Skip to main content

How to Bet on a Cat Fight by Mark Hatmaker


If one is serious about conflict and combat studies, it is instructive to open the examination to other species. Such studies allow us to see the myriad similarities in aggression, stand-down tactics, flight behavior, et cetera and allow them to inform our own game.

We humans often get a bit “theory-blind” and fail to see the biological laws before our eyes that will corrode misplaced tactical theory like rust through formerly thought impervious iron.

Such interspecies observations can make us better at our own game, or at the very least knock us off of our “human high-horse” so to speak.

Today, let’s have a look at our feline friends and what they have to teach us about ourselves.

Anatomy of a Cat Fight

·        The dominant cat or Aggressor will begin a stretch-legged “tall walking stalk” to appear larger.

·        The Defensive cat will display full flattened ears. This is preparation for battle, but not necessarily aggressive. Torn ears are common in cat battles and the full flattened ear is usually the defensive cat who would prefer the conflict to pass.

·        The Aggressor Cat will display ears rotated, the backs are facing forward. To fully flatten the ears, they must be rotated thusly but the not moving to full flattened signals “I’m ready for some shit but I don’t worry about you bitch.” They will go to flat once the attack is initiated but the back facing forward as opposed to full-flat is the cat to give wide berth.

·        The Aggressor will erect hairs along its back to increase the size signal, these hairs rise towards the tail and give the appearance of the cat being larger towards the back, which is the opposite of the submissive or defensive cat which will adopt a rear-end low to the ground posture.

·        Within about one-yard distance in the approach, the Aggressor cat will begin an intention movement with the head. It will slowly twist its head to one side while keeping eyes locked on the prey. As it moves closer it may do more than a few of these head-revolving motions.

·        All cats [domestic, lions and tigers, etc.] often kill with a bite to the neck, it is not a throat ripper so much as either a sometimes neck-snapper in lower-weight encounters [cat versus rodent or tiger versus Vegas magician] but more often a jugulation. Cat’s when matched in weight are often “choking out” their opponents with the ‘bite’ it is for this reason that in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu the choke is called “mata leao” or “lion-killer.”

·        These intention signals are the human equivalent of feinting with the jab or faking the take down. The aggressor cat is feinting for position to get to the throat-bite.

·        This phase can go on for some time accompanied by yowls and the well-named caterwauling, an equivalent of human trash-talking.

·        The closer the cats approach one another the slower and smaller the motions become. Again, the human analog is here, large feints in the outside range, smaller as the range closes.

·        If the fight is to be disengaged, the Submissive animal moves slowly out of range as if to say, “Yeah, I would do this but not today, I got more important shit to do today than fuck you up, but any other time…” Again, so so similar to human interaction—Aggressors and Submissives wanting to “save face.”

·        If the battle is serious, they will “close” that is move to grappling/throat-biting range where twisting and turning jockeying for throat position while protecting their own throat is paramount in this battle for neck access.

·        If the battle is of lesser stakes, the bite may be foregone for “paw scrapping” that is, essentially, boxing for a few swipes with the forepaws to settle the feline beef. Again, notice the human correlate, the few clumsy punches thrown by the “not really willing” and the balls-to-the-wall closing of range by the dead-serious.



For more such obseervations see this blog, and for pragmatic applications of old school tactics historically accurate and viciously verified see our RAW Subscription Service.]
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of
Post a Comment
Read more

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or
1 comment
Read more

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner. A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground. The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level. It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.] For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down. I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelli
Post a Comment
Read more