Skip to main content

Tomahawks, Trade Knives, & Tools by Mark Hatmaker


A thoughtful question from Affiliate Rough ‘n’ Tumble Coach Mitch Mitchell prompted me to offer the following advice regarding these two common items of frontier weaponry.

First, the part of Coach Mitchell’s Question/Observation that prompted what follows.
“Am I on the right track or holding my danged knife wrong? 

Bowie designs are manifold. My personal preference falls toward a flat spine knife with a half-guard because a spine-side guard or broken spine jams up my thumb on a sincere stab in sabre grip.  For me anyway, a nice, straight, full-power stab with a hammer grip on the high line is impossible and anyway it's is a wrist killer.”

His observation/complaint is common and one that leads to wisdom.

I will also point out that to discover that certain tactics and grips are wrist killers can only be garnered via experience, that is, hard post training.

If we stick with mirror play, shadow play, or tit for tat [zumbrada] flow drills with a partner using mocks we would likely never stumble on the realities of certain tactics.

Good on you, Coach Mitchell. Train real to find real.

On to my replied two-bits with an expansion.

·        Trade-knife designs were myriad.

·        Tomahawk designs were myriad.

·        That is, beyond a knife being a knife and a ‘hawk being a ‘hawk, smooth machine produced mass-manufactured perfectly weighted commercial ‘hawks and blades for the particular purpose of combat was a rarity.

·        You had a variety of designs and weights, lengths, guards, depth of back cut [or none at all] etc.

·        One had to be able to be facile with a variety of weapon/tool interfaces and to fall into a “This is MY carry” mindset is to miss the point of these historical items.

·        Blades were tools first and foremost. Cutting rope, making fuzz sticks for campfires, skinning game and all the myriad purposes of frontier survival.

·        The blade as a weapon was a rarity and/or hoped for way down the list choice of use.

·        The same goes for the tomahawk, which we must never forget is first and foremost a hatchet or camp ax. As in the case of trade-knives, it was a tool used daily and one that was hoped never to be used in martial matters.

·        Today we invert the tool choice pyramid and choose ‘hawks and blades for “cool martial presentation” and wouldn’t dare dull their sheen on quotidian matters.

·        With the eye on historical accuracy in mind, yes, I have pretty toys that I do not ding, but I have a wide variety of fair-to-middlin’ but all mighty functional blades and hatchets I’ve acquired in antique shops.

·        I find it wise to use them as the tools they were intended to be AND to train martial aspects with these self-same variously weighted, disparately lengthed tools to find what tactics shake out as being in common across all tool/weapon interfaces and thus of high utility, and what are specific to a single weapon—these tactics need to be culled by my way of thinking.

·        Go with the blade you dig in your own hand.

·        Toss tactics that jam, hurt, or make you simply feel uncomfy for if, God
forbid, you ever had to do it for real, you won't do it with conviction.

·        It's perfectly OK to not know or use every trick in the book.

·        It's never OK to keep things just to feel complete or check off a list.

Never lose sight of the fact that tomahawks were hatchets, knives were
knives. They were used for work and fighting was blip on the radar.

Today we buy expensive toys for fake fighting and lose sight of daily
utility.

[For techniques, tactics, and strategies of Rough and Tumble Combat, Old-School Boxing, Mean-Ass Wrestling, Street-Ready Frontier Scrapping & Indigenous Ability culled from the historical record see the RAW Subscription Service, or stay on the corral fence with the other dandified dudes and city-slickers. http://www.extremeselfprotection.com

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of
Post a Comment
Read more

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or
1 comment
Read more

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner. A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground. The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level. It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.] For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down. I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelli
Post a Comment
Read more