Skip to main content

The Front’s for Show, The Back’s for Go! The 8 Back PT Why’s by Mark Hatmaker



 


We could easily have titled this one, “The Primacy of the Posterior Chain in Combat Conditioning” but that’s a little less sexy than the chosen one.

Let us breakdown that opening salvo through the prism of Old School Conditioning, and to be clear, when I say Old School, I’m talking pre- “I use a little help,” in other words, all work and no dietary or supplemental juju, not even creatine.

That’s right, one can reap results on pure ol’ Southern Soul Food, heaps of BBQ, and a dessert each night even at an age when the loss of muscle mass due to aging is supposed to rear its head. [Sarcopenia is the technical word for this creeping loss of muscle mass that sets in after 40—for the record I’m 57-years-old at the time of this offering, so around 17 years into tissue entropy.]

Side-Bar for Bra Sizes: A casual comparison of photos between early physical culturists and the beginning of the Modern Era of bodybuilding where drug-use begins to rear its head, we see a few differences in physiques.

Yes, the obvious size difference due to pharmaceutical consumption but…proportionally, although “smaller” men and women in days of yore, the aesthetics are Greco-Roman Statuary excellence.

Also, the physical culturists of yore sport smaller chest sizes proportional to today’s behemoths.

Many of the new thought cadre assume this is due to lack of use of that go-to tool, the bench, as in the all mighty bench press.

This is a bit of an assumption stretch, the Old Schoolers may not have had a designated bench as in “This is for your bench press” but they did put a great deal of stock into chest work from myriad floor presses, box presses, and numerous flye variations.

The “smaller” chest was more a result of hewing to a Greco-Roman aesthetic, and these were the days when muscles were also for something—that is, many an old schooler was a wrestler, an acrobat, a boxer, a hand balancer, show-lifter et cetera. They were expected to be able to Do just as much as Show.

In other words, it was not just, “Look good” it was “Be good” at something beyond pick this up and then put it back down.

The chest musculature need not balloon to be an excellent performer or to provide Classical aesthetics.



8 Reasons Why the Old Schoolers Were All About That Back

1.     As we just outlined, there is often more back used than chest in actual athletic and work performance. Pulling, lifting, climbing, grappling, and on and on bring the back into play—the chest far less so.

2.     No Big Push Without a Big Pull. So, just because the bench was not emphasized nor was a protuberant chest prized, vast pushing power was still on the table. It’s just that it was recognized that to push well, one needs stabilization. Old Schoolers knew that any good push needs a commensurate stabilization from the antagonist side of the effort. Wanna up your bench? Go to work on the stabilizers of the upper and mid-back.

3.     Injury Prevention. This is an adjunct of the prior. Often pain while pressing, or injuries from a pressing incident are due to the imbalance of strength between the anterior and posterior chain. Unbalanced strength is no strength at all.

4.     Curling Stabilization. Just as the back plays a role in stabilizing the chest and pressing movements, it plays a like role in stabilizing the shoulder during curling motions. Again, if we experience pain while curling, sometimes this can be tracked down to weak back stabilization where we have tried to develop the show muscles ahead of the stabilizers. I repeat: Unbalanced strength is no strength at all.

5.     Stronger Back = Stronger Grappler. You show me a grappling movement that does not call for an essential “clutching to the core” movement, be that a choke, crank, leg lock, arm scissors, you name it—you show me the movement that does not involve the back in a big way and I’ll give you a big wet kiss. No worries, that kiss ain’t gonna happen, I’ve been at this game for 47 years and I’ve seen zero non-back involved movements that were worth 2-cents.

6.     Stronger Back = Harder Puncher. See Rule #2. If a stronger back provides greater pushing stabilization, “Hmm, what would happen when we apply a little speed with a balanced back and anterior development?” Yeah, BAM!

7.     Time-Saver/Biceps Builder. Each time you bend those arms the biceps come into play. 90% of back exercises call for the arms to be bent, in other words you are getting a two-fer, a back exercise and a biceps exercise in one. That is why Old Schoolers NEVER did any curling isolation before a back exercise—the smaller movers of the biceps would fatigue the big movers and remove the “strength purity” of the back movement. These would always be staged in opposite order with a stagger exercise between for re-fueling. Your biceps poundage may look lower when trained in this manner but that is only because they have been prefatigued and stabilized with the far more vital work. [See our Unleaded Conditioning Program for more on exercise staging.]


8.     A Leaner Torso. Now how can back work do this? Well, that back is a large slab of interlocking musculature. This is Metabolism 101 Crew, the more muscles we engage in energy expenditure, the more calories burned, the more calories burned the more we can whittle at that belly. Yeah, it’s a little counter-intuitive, “You mean I work the posterior chain and the anterior chain improves?” Yep.

There are another Two Reasons we would go into, but 8 feels enough for now.

Ponder all of the above factors when designing your own program, or you can use our Unleaded Conditioning Protocol that prescribes only one back exercise per day, it switches every single day, and only one of them asks us to use a weight.

The proof is in the pudding. I went 100% Old School Unleaded 4 years ago and it has been mighty kind to me.

Might it prove so to you!

For more Unleaded Conditioning info see our store!

Thinkin’ about becoming part of the Black Box Brotherhood?

Well, good on you!

Mull these resources, Warriors!

The Black Box Warehouse

The Rough ‘n’ Tumble Raconteur Podcast



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immig...

Walk Like a Warrior by Mark Hatmaker

In reading contemporary historical accounts written by soldiers (cavalry and dragoon), settlers, scouts, pioneers, and other citizens of the American frontier 1680s-1880s, I find mention that Native Americans (“Indians” or “Savages” in the accounts) did not walk like “white men.” Their gait, stride, and foot placement is described often in poetic terms as “light” or “light-footed,” “fleet”, “gliding”, and often times “springy” or “spring-like.” These terms while descriptive of the effect do little to tell us the how or why of the gait. We can find clues in accounts given by trackers in any of the myriad “Indian Wars” or skirmishes that riddled the continent in the first few centuries of the settling of the nation. The obvious telltale barefoot or soft impression of a moccasin is often a giveaway that you have a Native American track but this is less so in the moccasined foot as more and more Anglo backwoodsmen adopted this footwear. But there are a few accounts that mention ...

A Conversation with Neil Melanson by Mark Hatmaker

Here is a chat I had with a good man with a good mind, Neil Melanson. If you are unfamiliar with Neil’s exemplary work he has coached at Xtreme Couture, Alliance MMA, and a HC with the Blackzilians. He is now at gym Genesis Training Academy and Coach of the Filthy Few MMA team. -DVDs out are: Head Hunter, Catchwrestling, and Ground Marshal guard basics  -book Mastering Triangle Chokes -black belt under Karo Parisyan in the Hayastan Grappling System  First things first, Brother Neil, thanks for taking the time to have this chat. Allow me to get another thing out of the way, your book Mastering Triangle Chokes , top-notch. This is high-speed, low-drag stuff all the way. Often there is chaff to be culled through, but you have a linear approach that appeals to the pragmatic streak in me. Excellent work. Thanks a lot man.  You are a real articulate and detailed coach so that means a lot coming from you. Your approach to grappling appeals to my expansiv...