Skip to main content

The Front’s for Show, The Back’s for Go! The 8 Back PT Why’s by Mark Hatmaker



 


We could easily have titled this one, “The Primacy of the Posterior Chain in Combat Conditioning” but that’s a little less sexy than the chosen one.

Let us breakdown that opening salvo through the prism of Old School Conditioning, and to be clear, when I say Old School, I’m talking pre- “I use a little help,” in other words, all work and no dietary or supplemental juju, not even creatine.

That’s right, one can reap results on pure ol’ Southern Soul Food, heaps of BBQ, and a dessert each night even at an age when the loss of muscle mass due to aging is supposed to rear its head. [Sarcopenia is the technical word for this creeping loss of muscle mass that sets in after 40—for the record I’m 57-years-old at the time of this offering, so around 17 years into tissue entropy.]

Side-Bar for Bra Sizes: A casual comparison of photos between early physical culturists and the beginning of the Modern Era of bodybuilding where drug-use begins to rear its head, we see a few differences in physiques.

Yes, the obvious size difference due to pharmaceutical consumption but…proportionally, although “smaller” men and women in days of yore, the aesthetics are Greco-Roman Statuary excellence.

Also, the physical culturists of yore sport smaller chest sizes proportional to today’s behemoths.

Many of the new thought cadre assume this is due to lack of use of that go-to tool, the bench, as in the all mighty bench press.

This is a bit of an assumption stretch, the Old Schoolers may not have had a designated bench as in “This is for your bench press” but they did put a great deal of stock into chest work from myriad floor presses, box presses, and numerous flye variations.

The “smaller” chest was more a result of hewing to a Greco-Roman aesthetic, and these were the days when muscles were also for something—that is, many an old schooler was a wrestler, an acrobat, a boxer, a hand balancer, show-lifter et cetera. They were expected to be able to Do just as much as Show.

In other words, it was not just, “Look good” it was “Be good” at something beyond pick this up and then put it back down.

The chest musculature need not balloon to be an excellent performer or to provide Classical aesthetics.



8 Reasons Why the Old Schoolers Were All About That Back

1.     As we just outlined, there is often more back used than chest in actual athletic and work performance. Pulling, lifting, climbing, grappling, and on and on bring the back into play—the chest far less so.

2.     No Big Push Without a Big Pull. So, just because the bench was not emphasized nor was a protuberant chest prized, vast pushing power was still on the table. It’s just that it was recognized that to push well, one needs stabilization. Old Schoolers knew that any good push needs a commensurate stabilization from the antagonist side of the effort. Wanna up your bench? Go to work on the stabilizers of the upper and mid-back.

3.     Injury Prevention. This is an adjunct of the prior. Often pain while pressing, or injuries from a pressing incident are due to the imbalance of strength between the anterior and posterior chain. Unbalanced strength is no strength at all.

4.     Curling Stabilization. Just as the back plays a role in stabilizing the chest and pressing movements, it plays a like role in stabilizing the shoulder during curling motions. Again, if we experience pain while curling, sometimes this can be tracked down to weak back stabilization where we have tried to develop the show muscles ahead of the stabilizers. I repeat: Unbalanced strength is no strength at all.

5.     Stronger Back = Stronger Grappler. You show me a grappling movement that does not call for an essential “clutching to the core” movement, be that a choke, crank, leg lock, arm scissors, you name it—you show me the movement that does not involve the back in a big way and I’ll give you a big wet kiss. No worries, that kiss ain’t gonna happen, I’ve been at this game for 47 years and I’ve seen zero non-back involved movements that were worth 2-cents.

6.     Stronger Back = Harder Puncher. See Rule #2. If a stronger back provides greater pushing stabilization, “Hmm, what would happen when we apply a little speed with a balanced back and anterior development?” Yeah, BAM!

7.     Time-Saver/Biceps Builder. Each time you bend those arms the biceps come into play. 90% of back exercises call for the arms to be bent, in other words you are getting a two-fer, a back exercise and a biceps exercise in one. That is why Old Schoolers NEVER did any curling isolation before a back exercise—the smaller movers of the biceps would fatigue the big movers and remove the “strength purity” of the back movement. These would always be staged in opposite order with a stagger exercise between for re-fueling. Your biceps poundage may look lower when trained in this manner but that is only because they have been prefatigued and stabilized with the far more vital work. [See our Unleaded Conditioning Program for more on exercise staging.]


8.     A Leaner Torso. Now how can back work do this? Well, that back is a large slab of interlocking musculature. This is Metabolism 101 Crew, the more muscles we engage in energy expenditure, the more calories burned, the more calories burned the more we can whittle at that belly. Yeah, it’s a little counter-intuitive, “You mean I work the posterior chain and the anterior chain improves?” Yep.

There are another Two Reasons we would go into, but 8 feels enough for now.

Ponder all of the above factors when designing your own program, or you can use our Unleaded Conditioning Protocol that prescribes only one back exercise per day, it switches every single day, and only one of them asks us to use a weight.

The proof is in the pudding. I went 100% Old School Unleaded 4 years ago and it has been mighty kind to me.

Might it prove so to you!

For more Unleaded Conditioning info see our store!

Thinkin’ about becoming part of the Black Box Brotherhood?

Well, good on you!

Mull these resources, Warriors!

The Black Box Warehouse

The Rough ‘n’ Tumble Raconteur Podcast



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or

The Original Roadwork by Mark Hatmaker

  Mr. Muldoon Roadwork. That word, to the combat athlete, conjures images of pre-dawn runs, breath fogging the morning air and, to many, a drudgery that must be endured. Boxers, wrestlers, kickboxers the world over use roadwork as a wind builder, a leg conditioner, and a grit tester. The great Joe Frazier observed… “ You can map out a fight plan or a life plan, but when the action starts, it may not go the way you planned, and you're down to the reflexes you developed in training. That's where roadwork shows - the training you did in the dark of the mornin' will show when you're under the bright lights .” Roadwork has been used as a tool since man began pitting himself against others of his species in organized combat. But…today’s question . Has it always been the sweat-soaked old school gray sweat suit pounding out miles on dark roads or, was it something subtler, and, remarkably slower? And if it was, why did we transition to what, and I repeat myself,