Skip to main content

How to Be a Good Kidnap Victim by Mark Hatmaker


George “Machine Gun” Kelly, was a Depression-era gangster with one of the most colorful names going. Let’s face it, it beats the hell out of Baby Face or Pretty Boy, or Creepy. Despite the formidable name Kelly was a little less deadly than the moniker belies, associates in Alcatraz where he spent 21-years of his life referred to him as “Pop Gun” Kelly due to his model prisoner status and less than gangstery ways.

George Kelly, though not a cold-blooded killer, was, indeed, a criminal. He had numerous charges of bootlegging which in and of itself is not so glamourous a crime. It seems his wife, Kathryn Kelly, played the role of reputation-promoter, she gave him the name “Machine Gun” and sought to create the reputation that George himself did not really warrant.

The world may not have taken much notice of the dapper bootlegger had it not been for a switch in modus operandi. It seems the Kelly gang thought that there might be more money to be made in kidnapping than illegal liquor sales so they set their sights on one, Charles F. Urschel, a wealthy oil magnate in Oklahoma.

Kelly and his gang barged in on a bridge game at Urschel’s residence on July 22, 1933. The almost comically ill-prepared gang encountered two men at the bridge table and were not sure which one was Urschel so they took both men, Urschel and his guest Walter Jarrett. Once on the road Urschel declared who he was and urged them to set Jarrett free, which they did.

Urschel was blindfolded from the get-go and wound up being held in a farmhouse in Paradise, Texas for over a week. He was released on July 30th after a ransom of $200,000 dollars was paid by the family.

The FBI was involved from the beginning of the case thanks to new kidnapping as Federal crime legislation following the tragedy that was the Lindbergh Baby Kidnapping.

The FBI receives the credit for capturing Kelly and his gang, but what must be pointed to is the fact that this might not have been done if it were not for the amazing observational prowess of Urschel himself.

Despite being blindfolded for much of the time, Urschel managed to:

·        Covertly touch as many surfaces as he could in the home in unusual locations so that once wiped free of prints many of Urschel’s still remained for confirmation.

·        He noted the pitch of speech and locality of dialect of each gang-member. Always listening for distinguishing phrases and slips of the tongue.

·        He noted an airplane that passed overhead around the same time every day and “timed” that passage with an estimation from a rooster crowing and other aural clues.

The Observant Mr. Urschel

In short, Mr. Urschel, although a captive, never stopped paying attention, or should I say, in the midst of what must be an exceptionally stressful time, he feared for his life after all, he never lost his wits. In fact, he doubled down on his native intelligence and was able to provide the observational clues that led to pinpointing the farmhouse, and from there to the arrest of the gang-members.

Now, here’s the question to ask ourselves, just how observant are we, that is, me and you, in the here and now?

Do we note what is going on around us even without the onus of “fear-for-life” stress and blindfolds?

Do we note apparent patterns such as regular plane passages? Or, are we “blind” to what is around us while our eyes are wide-open?

We must ask ourselves, if we don’t prepare, train, and prime our observational skills now, are we hoping for too much when we assume that while blind to what is around us in the here and now we will be Charles F. Urschel calm, cool, collected and intelligent when it hits the fan?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Warrior Awareness Drills by Mark Hatmaker

THE Primary Factor in self-protection/self-defense is situational awareness. Keeping in mind that crime is, more often than not, a product of opportunity, if we take steps to reduce opportunity to as close to nil as we can manage we have gone a long way to rendering our physical tactical training needless [that’s a good thing.]
Yes, having defensive tactical skills in the back-pocket is a great ace to carry day-to-day but all the more useful to saving your life or the lives of loved ones is a honed awareness, a ready alertness to what is occurring around you every single day.
Here’s the problem, maintaining such awareness is a Tough job with a capital T as most of our daily lives are safe and mundane [also a good thing] and this very safety allows us to backslide in good awareness practices. Without daily danger-stressors we easily fall into default comfort mode.
A useful practice to return awareness/alertness to the fore is to gamify your awareness, that is, to use a series of specific…

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner.
A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground.
The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level.
It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.]
For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down.
I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelling] starting at the top, t…

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “But what if…”


Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “but what if…” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.


The “but what if…” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “but what if…” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario.


Predator: Do what I say and I won’t hurt you.


Or, some other such promise to the victim.


Now, these sorts of …