[The below is excerpted from our book Boxing for MMA.]
Any discussion of stance worth its
salt has to use Good Athletic Position (GAP) as the default starting base. For
the uninitiated, GAP is the fundamental good mechanical position that the body
assumes when it is expected to perform optimally across a variety of stressors.
These stressors can be a sudden vertical jump, a quick explosive lift, a
preparation to move to either direction laterally, to transition to
back-pedaling, et cetera. The key to GAP is that it is a preparation for
variety, a start point for options if you will.
Task Specific Positions (TSP) begin
with the end in mind. That is, the sprinter knows which direction the body must
move, the batter knows the approximate plane he must swing into, the fighter
setting up the spin kick knows where and how she must set the hips to
facilitate the smooth pirouette. Still, even with TSP there are, usually, only
minor adjustments from GAP, and this close adherence is for good reason.
GAP
wisely adheres to an equal distribution of weight so that movement is any
cardinal direction can be smoothly transitioned into. Too much weight over any
given foot slows the transition into that direction.
GAP’s
equal distribution of weight not only optimizes mobility it increases access to
power. Full body commitment is already realized by having both feet underneath
the hips,
GAP
allows for quick power access to any given side by this same equal distribution
of weight. If I am running a 70/30 stance (70% of weight over the rear foot/30%
over the lead) I’ve got to make up that distribution when I go for lead side
strikes. In my 50/50 GAP position a flex of the rear calf and a pelvic torque
loads me for power.
OK, I’ve rhapsodized GAP as the way to
go with stance, but I want to stretch this idea further. There is a tendency in
some combat disciplines to pay a lot of attention to stance as if it were an
isolated element. That is “OK, here is
our stance, got it? Looks good. Now, here is some other stuff to learn.”
I’m pleading a case for not thinking of stance as a stock-still element but
rather an athletic position that informs all
of your movement. After all what good is a stance if it no longer supports your
offense or defense as soon as you take your first step? Fights happen on the
move, MMA and street-encounters are not some Karate Kid crane stance adolescent
fantasy.
With every step you take, with every
punch you throw, with every takedown you stuff, with every move you make, in an
ideal world, you should be analyzing it for GAP and making adjustments whenever
and wherever possible to adhere as closely as you can manage to perfection.
Always be asking questions about GAP in your training.
Are
you falling into your punches rather than stepping into them? If the answer is
falling I smell an easily countered fighter and/or a lead leg weight-loaded
rife for leg-kick punishment.
Is
your lateral movement over-loaded when you move? A leg kick or Lyoto Machida
style foot sweep will bring that foolishness to the mat.
Is
the lead foot light? Sounds like someone is inviting the takedown.
Is
the stance too high? Again, takedown city.
Any
deviation from GAP acts either as a situation to be countered or information
about your intentions.
Stance
although similar to the word stand is not really about how you stand.
Stance
is an athletic start point that travels with you wherever you go.
Stance
is every step you take.
Stance
is every punch you throw.
Comments
Post a Comment