Skip to main content

The Influential & The Influence by Mark Hatmaker

 


A landmark of the 20th and 21st century martial community has completed his sojourn on the planet—Mr. Gene LeBell.

I will not pretend to the sadness that his family and close relations feel. To horn in on that grief strikes me as a bit solipsistic and disrespectful of those tighter bonds that will shed tangible and visible salt-laden tears for Mr. LeBell.

Their loss, their pain weighs far heavier than my distant appreciation and affection can compass.

Am I saying I am unaffected? Oh, Hell No.

I simply offer the perspective that to equate with the proximate ones is a bit short-sighted and blunts the external empathy gaze a bit.

My take is likely eccentric and idiosyncratic and of no value.

On to the Influence of Mr. LeBell.

To say that he was [is] influential is an understatement.

If one is involved in the world of grappling, then I will say nothing here of his history that you do not already know.

Instead, I will step into the shallow waters of my own experience and offer that yes, Mr. LeBell was influential, so I’d like to say how he was influential—not to the community at large but to the anecdote of one man—me.

The Influence of the Influential

I had already been scufflin’ via my Grandfather [George Washington Goins] and my cousins for years before I ever came across Mr. LeBell.

What struck me at first, was likely what struck many—the over-the-top presentation borne of pro-wrestling rings around the world.

I’ll admit, this portion held no influence on me, but…what did, was this.

Mr. LeBell was once described as “A man who’s forgotten more finishing holds than you’ll ever know.” At that moment, I thought, “Oh, hell yeah—that’s a worthy trove of knowledge to shoot for.”

Mr. LeBell embodies [to me] the mindset that frees one from a linear dogmatic path to knowledge—be it in the grappling domain, or hell, anywhere else.

To forget more than most know” means that he did not confine himself to a system or to a single path. It meant that he looked at anything and everything he deemed pertinent to his passion.

Yes, of course, he offered us all “Here’s some slick tricks” but more importantly he offered an eyes and mind wide-open gimlet-eyed gaze that was always willing to garner more tactics and more importantly [to my eye, at least] reverse-engineer what is or was known inside-out and say, “Yeah, but if you construct it this way, this pain changes to THIS PAIN.”

He offered us all how to think. How to not to accept all on a platter.

Being a legend himself he was skeptical of legends.

The history/mythology surrounding his judgment of Bruce Lee, no matter how much truth may or may not be within, allows us to see a spirit of “Don’t face value it, dig in for the pith and see what’s what.”

Admittedly not all of his lessons seat with many. Some miss the point, or perhaps I am the mistaken one.

Some respect his encyclopedic knowledge and seek to replicate the copious arsenal.

And…there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

I merely offer that this man’s powerful influence on my own thinking was not mere replication and duplication.

It goes deeper than that. It was and is a way to see each “finishing hold” as, yes, an entity unto itself, but also as part of a class of like mayhem, and even beyond that-- principles that concoct said mayhem to be pulled apart willy-nilly in an instruction-book free world where we understand how to create new mayhem.

To my mind, that influence has been monumental in my life, my thought, my world.

I am mighty grateful for that influence.

Mabitsiar’u Mr. LeBell

[To my mind, our recent piece Jugulations, Strangulations, Neck-Breakers, & Molar-Poppers, is reflective of this influence.]

[For more Rough& Tumble history, Indigenous Ability hacks, and for pragmatic applications of old school tactics historically accurate and viciously verified see our RAW/Black Box Subscription Service.]

Or our brand-spankin’ new podcast The Rough and Tumble Raconteur available on all platforms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immig...

A Conversation with Neil Melanson by Mark Hatmaker

Here is a chat I had with a good man with a good mind, Neil Melanson. If you are unfamiliar with Neil’s exemplary work he has coached at Xtreme Couture, Alliance MMA, and a HC with the Blackzilians. He is now at gym Genesis Training Academy and Coach of the Filthy Few MMA team. -DVDs out are: Head Hunter, Catchwrestling, and Ground Marshal guard basics  -book Mastering Triangle Chokes -black belt under Karo Parisyan in the Hayastan Grappling System  First things first, Brother Neil, thanks for taking the time to have this chat. Allow me to get another thing out of the way, your book Mastering Triangle Chokes , top-notch. This is high-speed, low-drag stuff all the way. Often there is chaff to be culled through, but you have a linear approach that appeals to the pragmatic streak in me. Excellent work. Thanks a lot man.  You are a real articulate and detailed coach so that means a lot coming from you. Your approach to grappling appeals to my expansiv...

Walk Like a Warrior by Mark Hatmaker

In reading contemporary historical accounts written by soldiers (cavalry and dragoon), settlers, scouts, pioneers, and other citizens of the American frontier 1680s-1880s, I find mention that Native Americans (“Indians” or “Savages” in the accounts) did not walk like “white men.” Their gait, stride, and foot placement is described often in poetic terms as “light” or “light-footed,” “fleet”, “gliding”, and often times “springy” or “spring-like.” These terms while descriptive of the effect do little to tell us the how or why of the gait. We can find clues in accounts given by trackers in any of the myriad “Indian Wars” or skirmishes that riddled the continent in the first few centuries of the settling of the nation. The obvious telltale barefoot or soft impression of a moccasin is often a giveaway that you have a Native American track but this is less so in the moccasined foot as more and more Anglo backwoodsmen adopted this footwear. But there are a few accounts that mention ...