Skip to main content

Hacking Visual Acuity the Sea-Gypsy Way by Mark Hatmaker



How’s your eyesight? Good? Fair to middlin’?



How’s your eyesight underwater with no diving mask on?



How about if I told you there may be a way to gain a bit of improvement in both above-water and below water environments?



An improvement that calls for a remarkably short time investment on your part?



Stay with me as we learn a thing or two from the Moken.



The Moken [literally “sea people” or “sea nomads” or “sea gypsies”] are an Austronesian people that inhabit the 800 some odd islands of the Mergui Archipelago that are claimed by both Burma and Thailand.

The Moken garner almost their entire livelihood from the Andaman Sea. You may have read about them in the pages of National Geographic or seen them in videos making lengthy hunting dives free of breathing apparatus, diving fins, or diving masks. Images of them moving agilely about on the sea floor are beautiful and inspire wonder [and a bit of envy in this viewer.]

The human eye has evolved to be a rather delicate and precise viewer of the above-water world but for those of us who can even keep our eyes open beneath the water’s surface we find that we’re lucky if we can see a mere three feet in front of us.



So how is it that the Moken, spears in hand, are able to hunt beneath the surface and make precise spear-strikes with no diving masks?

Experienced spearfishermen and scuba-divers know that even with diving masks there is a bit of double refraction going on as the atmosphere between the cornea and the retina creates one bend of light and the air between the glass of the diving-mask and the cornea creates a second bend spawning a distortion of distance and angle that must be corrected for. This correction can only be made with experience.

And yet, the Moken do all this just fine without a diving mask.

Is this a genetic adaptation to their environment specific to the Moken, or is there something else going on?

Anna Gislen, Eric Warrant, Marie Dacke, and Ronald Kroger, all of Lund University in Sweden devised an ingenious experiment to divine whether underwater visual acuity was indigenous to diving cultures such as the Moken, or is there some skill to be learned. A skill that could be trained and used by anyone.



They first tested just how keen the Moken’s eyesight is beneath the water using the Pelli-Robson chart which tests for visual contrast, our ability to distinguish shapes, a major need when hunting underwater.

They then gathered subjects not of the Moken [European and Thai] and submitted them to the same tests in a pool environment that mimicked the conditions of the Andaman Sea.

Acuity at 3-6 meters, no real difference between the test subjects and the Moken.

Once you get to 9-12 meters, the Moken still see just fine, whereas the test subjects are out of the game.

The test subjects are then ushered through 11 training days spread out over a 1-month period. In these sessions, they dive to the bottom of the pool, and press their faces to a viewer where they are presented with various forms of Pelli-Robson charts as well as having a water-proofed video camera record pupil dilation.

It was surmised by the researchers that they Moken are able to voluntarily constrict pupils enabling them to improve contrast resolution underwater.

Initially, the subjects were experiencing no pupil change, but by the end of the training pupil change was easily noted being engaged in by all.

How did they foster voluntary pupil-change? We’ll get to that.

First, how did they do by the end of their training session?

Did underwater vision improve?

After the 11th session, there was pupil change in all and an improvement in underwater contrast performance of 27%, with the least performing subject coming in at a 17% improvement.

17-27% improvement in 11 sessions in one-month is nothing to sneeze at.

But get this, the subjects were retested after four months during which there was zero training sessions. At the re-test the pupil contraction was automatic, and the improvement comparison was 57%!

The subjects at this point were on par with the Moken test-figures and some surpassing them.

So clearly, we are looking at a learned adaptation.

Think carefully about this...

How many areas of physical training can you think of where you can train for 11 sessions, see improvement, take 4 months off and still improve?

Exactly how does this occur. The answer is fuzzy, but these are surmises.

The improvement during non-training is chalked up to consolidation or reminiscence, which is another way of saying that the 11-sessions acted as neural pathway training cementing a skill, as when we learn to ride a bike and can pick it up again after years of non-bike riding.

It is also surmised that a bit of blurred contrast training can be carried into the above-water environment. Rosenberg et al. (2004) noticed an improvement in visual acuity in myopic subjects after only 3 h of exposure to blur.” This is above-water blur exposure, as in decreasing Kindle font size, moving the print of a physical book just to the point of blur aka “print-pushing,” etc. [More on this another day, with a few unique ideas on vision-training from other indigenous cultures.]

So, beyond the apparent “work with the task of contrast resolution underwater until it sticks” were there any specific hacks to pass along?

Indeed, there are.

The subjects learned to cross their eyes when focusing on the contrast tasks, this led to pupil constriction. The constriction increased over time, i.e., exercise/practice, or skill-consolidation.

A subject who was unable to cross their eyes, compensated by looking upward and/or learned to cross one eye.

The eye-crossing seems to lead to pupil constriction and sets the stage for building a bit of increased visual acuity both in and out of the water.

There you have it: An inspiring people, the Moken, an ingenious experiment, and a hackable skill that pays dividends in very little time.

Comments

  1. This was an excellent blog I learn something from these blog about Ethical Hacking Online Training . Try yourself once.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Warrior Awareness Drills by Mark Hatmaker

THE Primary Factor in self-protection/self-defense is situational awareness. Keeping in mind that crime is, more often than not, a product of opportunity, if we take steps to reduce opportunity to as close to nil as we can manage we have gone a long way to rendering our physical tactical training needless [that’s a good thing.]
Yes, having defensive tactical skills in the back-pocket is a great ace to carry day-to-day but all the more useful to saving your life or the lives of loved ones is a honed awareness, a ready alertness to what is occurring around you every single day.
Here’s the problem, maintaining such awareness is a Tough job with a capital T as most of our daily lives are safe and mundane [also a good thing] and this very safety allows us to backslide in good awareness practices. Without daily danger-stressors we easily fall into default comfort mode.
A useful practice to return awareness/alertness to the fore is to gamify your awareness, that is, to use a series of specific…

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner.
A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground.
The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level.
It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.]
For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down.
I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelling] starting at the top, t…

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “But what if…”


Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “but what if…” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.


The “but what if…” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “but what if…” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario.


Predator: Do what I say and I won’t hurt you.


Or, some other such promise to the victim.


Now, these sorts of …