Skip to main content

The Original Roadwork by Mark Hatmaker

 

Mr. Muldoon

Roadwork.

That word, to the combat athlete, conjures images of pre-dawn runs, breath fogging the morning air and, to many, a drudgery that must be endured.

Boxers, wrestlers, kickboxers the world over use roadwork as a wind builder, a leg conditioner, and a grit tester.

The great Joe Frazier observed…

You can map out a fight plan or a life plan, but when the action starts, it may not go the way you planned, and you're down to the reflexes you developed in training. That's where roadwork shows - the training you did in the dark of the mornin' will show when you're under the bright lights.”

Roadwork has been used as a tool since man began pitting himself against others of his species in organized combat.

But…today’s question.

Has it always been the sweat-soaked old school gray sweat suit pounding out miles on dark roads or, was it something subtler, and, remarkably slower?

And if it was, why did we transition to what, and I repeat myself, many regard as a necessary evil?

The history of early boxing [bare fist to early glove era] and early wrestling [pre-show, i.e., today’s professional wrestling] abounds with accounts of training regimens that include roadwork, but…this roadwork takes the form of long walks, often with trainers and a few others side by side in long rambles through the countryside.

These, seemingly, amiable jaunts would play poorly in a Rocky training montage—men in trousers and peaked caps wandering the hills engaged in conversation.

And yet, we find reference after reference that this is exactly the manner most “roadwork” was undertaken.

I will allow one account to stand for all as it involves a noted boxer, John L. Sullivan, being trained by a noted wrestler, William Muldoon. [For those not in the know, Muldoon was a helluva matman, could throw hands well, and was noted for being a stalwart conditioner of fighters. With that in mind, we are getting a peek at “roadwork” in combination fighting.]

Reporter, Nellie Bly, of rounding the world in 72 days fame to beat Jules Verne’s fictional record, spent time with Sullivan and Muldoon at The Great John L’s training camp as he prepared to face Jake Kilrain in Richburg, Mississippi.

Ms. Bly


[The extracts come from Bly’s article in the May 26, 1889 edition of the New York World.]

[Muldoon] “We have just returned from our two-mile walk” he said.”

[A mere two-miles, wha?]

Sullivan reports it thusly…

Well, I get up about 6 o’clock and get rubbed down…Then Muldoon and I walk and run a mile or a mile and a half away and then back.”

[Sounds like a mix of intervals does it not? Although, Muldoon makes no mention of this.]

[Sullivan again] “After breakfast I rest awhile, and then putting on our heaviest clothes again we start out for our twelve-mile run and walk.”

[Again, sounds like a mix of intervals, at the very least a fartlek approach.

For the uninitiated, fartlek is “a system of training for distance runners in which the terrain and pace are continually varied to eliminate boredom and enhance psychological aspects of conditioning.”]

There is a great deal of detail given regarding all else that is done—primarily boxing, wrestling, hitting a variety of bags, dumbbells, Indian Clubs, chest expanders, etc.

Muldoon did not use the same “walk-run” pace here. He pushed his fighters to use the combat sports training and the resistance training to capacity.

It seems the walks [with or without running] were adjuncts, almost contemplative active recovery rather than what we may see it as today.

This view of roadwork pops up again and again in old accounts. Walking as roadwork is ever-present, seldom does it go unmentioned, but…rarely do we hear it pushed into running as we find it here.

Oh, one more from Bly’s article, this is Sullivan responding to Bly’s query: “Then training is not very pleasant work.”

“It’s the worst thing going. A fellow would rather fight twelve dozen times then train once, but it’s got to be done.”

Again, Muldoon was a noted and respected wrestler and trainer of wrestlers and boxers. He emphasized building stamina via strength and the sport itself as the wind-builder.

Mr. Sullivan


A Question is Raised?

If [if] walking was considered as roadwork, why did running rise to prominence?

I offer a guess…I leave it to you divine if there is truth in it.

Pre-automobile, pre-mass transportation most everyone walked. Everywhere. Often.

Yes, there were horses in the world but… despite our cinematic images, most horses were used as draft animals, fewer owned horses for travel than is assumed, and even here, if anyone has ever actually tended for a horse and gone through the steps of saddling, unsaddling preparing a horse for a ride—well, if the trip was short, it was often an easier choice to simply walk.

Most seemingly preferred to walk.

History and literature is full of astounding accounts of walks—staggering distances, frequencies of walks by amblers of all ages and both sexes.

These are found in the casual off-mentions, not the point of the story, as in this journal entry, “Walked to Meister’s today for a visit, the 12 miles of heath were a tonic to the eye.”

12 miles. The journal mentions that they are home that evening, so, our walker did a 24-mile roundtrip in a single day and that was not the point of the journal entry.

The reason for the visit? Just to chat.

Today we would post about it and expect a participation t-shirt for such feats.

And yet, this was the norm. Poets, charwomen, millers, farmers, publicans, everyone walked, They walked most everywhere they wished to go.

Round trips of as much of 30 miles were not unheard of. Most distances came in well under that but…

They walked far and often, if not daily, almost daily—with distances of 5-8 being considered, well, a walk in the park.

The world prior to mass transit, prior to the automobile was a world of walking humans. Not a chosen few who do so for exercise—but everyone everywhere to spread across the globe.

Walking was the base-rate of travel and, I wager, fitness.

But Mark, you didn’t answer the question--Why did we see the move from walking to running as roadwork?”

You’re right, hold the base rate of walking and daily round trip tallies in your mind as we look at yet another sport, that of physical culturists [the fore-runners of today’s body-building.]

The early muscle-men and women from the stout Louis Cyr to the astonishingly lean Eugen Sandow saw running as a “strength killer.” An activity that eats into muscular gains.

To Muldoon and other early boxers, wrestlers, combination athletes and physical culturists running was anathema to muscular progress, and even kyboshed skill-development.

It “ate” what you built in the skill and execution area.

No "Roadwork" for the Elderly


Wind, stamina, and as some called it then “bottom” was highly valued, it was simply sought elsewhere—via the action of the sport in question in most all cases.

That is, boxers engaged in lots and lots of boxing, wrestlers in lots of and lots of wrestling, and if one wished to run long distances, well, then it made sense to run.

The “cross-training” made no sense to the Old-Timer’s mind.

Let us flip the practice and we can perhaps see it how they saw it.

Let’s say you come to me and ask me, “Mark, I want to get ready for a marathon, can you lay me out a running schedule?”

I say, “Sure, first let’s do 12 rounds on the heavy bag, 6 on the double-end, then some calisthenics floorwork, then we’ll pause for lunch and follow that with 12 more rounds on pads and this evening we’ll do 6 controlled rounds of sparring.”

You then reply, “Um, but won’t that tire me out? When will I have the time or energy to run?”

Exactly. The Old-Timers saw running-roadwork as a time eater and muscle eater.

This subject is hardly exhausted, we could delve deeper into the centuries old walking over running tale, what “footmen” and the “mile” have to offer as insight, the popularity of the sport of pedestrianism, ramblers and flaneurs, and put that evolutionary argument of persistence running up against the roaming hypothesis.

Fodder for another day.

But now, finally, I offer my answer, guess, surmise.

Why did running become the modern definition of roadwork?

Simply, we quit walking. We have such an abundance of easy transportation, easy resources at our fingertips that walking even a mere mile a day in the course of events is a rarity.

Where before we were conditioned by our daily lives, now we must corral all of our beneficial effort into bite-size regimented exercise portions at the extremes to compensate for the deficit. If we are not going to walk 12-mile round trips as a matter of course, then we’ve got to lace up the shoes and develop the discipline to start covering at least some distance in the quickest amount of time we have allotted for training so we can hurry back to our conveniences of not walking anywhere.

Just a guess, but…that’s the horse I’d bet.

[BTW-Sullivan defeated Kilrain. Knocked him out in the 75th round. 75 rounds? Sounds like his conditioning was just fine.]

[For more Rough& Tumble history, Indigenous Ability hacks, and for pragmatic applications of old school tactics historically accurate and viciously verified see our RAW/Black Box Subscription Service.]

Or our brand-spankin’ new podcast The Rough and Tumble Raconteur available on all platforms.

A Fine Tout



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or