Skip to main content

YOU CAN’T RUN FROM A GUN, OR CAN YOU? By Mark Hatmaker


Let’s talk real world, rubber meets road altercation. Zero room for sport-fighting or choreography here.



In the “Fight or Flight” dictum we always counsel flight. Run. Get the hell out of wherever you are as quickly as possible. Some, will read the “flee no matter what” advice and cock an eyebrow asking “Always run? Even if they have a gun?”



You are right to be skeptical, after all, a gun does seem to be the great equalizer, able to inflict grievous harm upon us even at a distance. So, what do we do when we encounter a gun? Sorry to be the proverbial broken record but…you run.



Let me offer the following information to make your choice to run, no matter what, a bit more confident. 



Ÿ  Under 5% of armed robbers utilizing a firearm fire the weapon--those are good odds to run. Repeat—Under 5%. A percentage point of somewhere in the neighborhood of 95+% do not fire the brandished weapon.

Ÿ  Those who do fire the guns are not armed robbers but murderers or attempted murderers--I advise you to run from murderers.

Ÿ  Give up your property [always replaceable], flee and bet house odds.

Ÿ  What of those victims who are fired upon?

Ÿ  10% of the fired-upon victims of armed robbery are murdered.  Scary, right? Of course, it is. But…

Ÿ  This scenario brings us to a 10% chance at escalated violence that requires you to put distance between you and the gun. The odds favor running in either case. That is, if we have a non-firing armed-robber 95+% or a firing murderer under 5%. Of those who do fire, 10% are killed.

Ÿ  Those 10% who are murdered are shot at point blank range--again, another reason to put distance between you and them.

Ÿ  Firearms require accuracy--the greater the distance the less the chance for accuracy.

Ÿ  As a rule, criminals have not participated in a firearm familiarization course. That’s good news.

Ÿ  Adrenaline decreases accuracy, also good news as adrenaline does indeed secrete in the execution of a crime. Your adrenaline dump will fuel speed and gross-motor movement, the Predator’s adrenaline dump will decrease fine-motor skills. A smidge to our favor.

Ÿ  Distance + Adrenaline + Low Probability of rigorous firearms instruction for the predator = Run.

Ÿ  4%--Revel in that number. That is an informal police department estimate of the percentage that gun-wielding predators hit their targets. 4% is definitely in the run column. That puts the miss percentage at 96%.

Ÿ  Four shots fired per hit. What is this? This is the national average for law enforcement, citizens, and predators engaged in gun battle. 4-1 ratio.

Ÿ  Get this, the distance in these gun confrontations is…three to nine feet.

Ÿ  Three to nine feet and four shots fired per hit overall again gives heft to the advice to run no matter what. Distance is not just your friend; it is your life-saving friend.

Ÿ  1-inch per yard. What’s this? That is the spread of 00 buck ammunition fired from a shotgun--1 inch per yard. Film and television depictions leads us to believe that the ammunition dispersal from a shotgun would rule against running but the 1” per yard figure combined with the four shots fired per hit leads us again to put distance between you and your gun-wielding attacker.

Ÿ  From point-blank range to 10’ it seldom matters what is being fired.

Ÿ  The two biggest factors in determining gunshot accuracy and or wounding severity are distance (the closer the distance the greater the accuracy) and what portion of the body is hit.

Ÿ  But what of knife-wielding attackers?

Ÿ  An assailant wielding a knife is more likely to use it than those who use guns--21% of the time but…a knife is a close-range weapon--again distance is your friend.





Please consider the above information carefully and see that, as daunting as defying a weapon wielding predator may seem, running is your best self-defense no matter what.



Leave the tricky disarms to the John Wick films where they belong and run.



Deciding to run no matter what is playing the odds to save your life.






Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immig...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Original Roadwork by Mark Hatmaker

  Mr. Muldoon Roadwork. That word, to the combat athlete, conjures images of pre-dawn runs, breath fogging the morning air and, to many, a drudgery that must be endured. Boxers, wrestlers, kickboxers the world over use roadwork as a wind builder, a leg conditioner, and a grit tester. The great Joe Frazier observed… “ You can map out a fight plan or a life plan, but when the action starts, it may not go the way you planned, and you're down to the reflexes you developed in training. That's where roadwork shows - the training you did in the dark of the mornin' will show when you're under the bright lights .” Roadwork has been used as a tool since man began pitting himself against others of his species in organized combat. But…today’s question . Has it always been the sweat-soaked old school gray sweat suit pounding out miles on dark roads or, was it something subtler, and, remarkably slower? And if it was, why did we transition to what, and I repeat myself,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fightin’ Words: “I’m Gonna Clean your Clock!” by Mark Hatmaker

To our ears quaint, in a former time formidable, the expression “ I’m gonna clean your clock! ” was not a mere amusing gibe heard bandied about in a 1930s film but a bondafide threat with a meaning well understood by all. Until the 1940s the pre-dominant mode of mass-transportation in the United States was via railway. Indeed, America had embraced the automobile, but railroad tracks spanned and spider-webbed the nation whereas roads, while plentiful, were not quite what we may expect. In 1927 the first transcontinental highway in the world, Lincoln Highway, was only continuously paved from New York to Iowa. From there paving was intermittent, signage rare, roadside markers almost nonexistent. In the words of one contemporary user of the road, the highway was “ largely hypothetical .” So, while the automobile was on the rise the railroad dominated. Everyone knew railways, had some experience with them and to an unusual degree the railroad was held in a bit of romantic regar...
Post a Comment
Read more