Skip to main content

“Scatter-Gun” Street Tactics by Mark Hatmaker


We’ll be talking three little targeted aspects of street/reality work that we will loosely label “Scatter-Gun” tactics. 


First, that name. In my ongoing historical research, I have come across a few instances of phrases along the lines of “Scatter ‘em!” or “Don’t forget your scatter-gun” also “shotgun” has been used here and there in the same context, as in “He got shotgunned all to hell.”


What was initially puzzling to me is that often these references were in incidents where no weapon was pulled. 


Finally, the key came together when realizing that we are hearing archaic slang for targets along the periphery, that is, forgoing, or at least, adding to the usual targets of head, limb, and body.


We hear echoes of this euphemism in old prison slang. The most current usage I can find of it is in “Paul Wade’s” Convict Conditioning 2 where he refers to training the neck, grip, and calves as “shotgun muscle.” He explains it thusly:

These groups were often called shotgun muscles by the old-time prison athletes, because they ride shotgun with the bigger movers.”


In the original Rough ‘n’ Tumble usage scatter-gun or shotgun is not in reference to the muscle group but to the targeted areas of: Hands, feet, and neck.


Let’s address these one at a time.


THE FEET


Stomping of the feet is so ubiquitous in old accounts it almost remarkable when one does not encounter it. Stomping, grinding, grating, heeling, “chopping”, was seemingly everywhere. 


It was so common in lumber camps it picked up the name “caulking” [pronounced “corking”] named for the metal tread-grips called “caulks” that lumberjacks attached to their boots. 


This common practice also led to another wild bit of slang called “Lumberjack’s Smallpox” which referred to facial scars bore by any jack who has had his face stomped in some past melee. The commonplace of this slang let’s us know, that just because someone was down, niceties were not offered.


We see in Dempsey’s Falling Step the remnants of “caulking” as part and parcel of a punch. 


We see in “foot-tapping” in trade-knife work that same remnant and awareness of foot-stomps as part and parcel of the game.


The historical record shows us foot-stomping in a variety of ways was not some rare event, as with Marco Ruas’s wise use of the tactic in the early days of The Ultimate Fighting Championship.


THE NECK


Another scatter-gun target was the neck. The neck is prime rib to the grappler. It is the source of chokes, strangles, jugulations, cranks, and other such mayhem but…to the early Rough ‘n’ Tumblers it was also a prime striking target.


Throat punches, neck chops, rabbit-shots [of an astonishing variety and surprising angles] were all coveted tactics. Let’s face it, the soft tissue of that which holds up the head is far kinder on the bare hands than the vastly harder and meaner surfaced human skull.


We could go on and on with refences to “neck-punching” in early bare-knuckle matches. Whether accidental or intentional the neck-punch ended more than a few bouts or led the way to the end.


If we see how useful jabbing and slicing to the neck was in the sportive version of mayhem, we can only imagine how much more so in a rough ‘n’ tumble scrum for all the marbles.


THE HANDS


Busting hands, popping fingers, knuckle-busting, ripping digits was also a very large part of the inventory of viciousness.


The strikers valued knuckle-busting and “attacking bucklers” and other such tactics. 


The grapplers in the clinch or on the grass put a premium on de-commissioning the hands. You can class this as grappling at the “tail-ends,” or below-the-wrist-ripping. There was/is a class of “submissions” that were street ready prompts from the old days where you fished small-to-large and made the transition to the “big holds” move like greased-lightning. 


These small actions are not the period on a submission sentence, meaning the snapping of a finger was not the be-all-end-all, they are accent marks along the way. Bottle-openers, splitters, hitchers, milkers, knuckle-cutters were all devilishly small details that spurred bigger moves.


These bigger moves seen in isolation often have the appearance of “show-holds” or co-operative choreography. To be truthful, in many instances today they are just that.


But if they are preceded by the “tail-end” approach this small violence portends even worse things above the phalanges, carpals, and meta-carpals.


A scatter-gun does not ignore the big targets. What a scatter-gun does is to make sure we don’t tunnel on the big targets. We know we may be aiming at center-of-mass for a sure drop, but nothing insures that “sure drop” like a blast from a shotgun that brings in collateral damage at the periphery.


[For techniques, tactics, and strategies of Rough and Tumble Combat & Indigenous Ability culled from the historical record see the RAW Subscription Service.]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner. A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground. The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level. It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.] For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down. I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelli