Two
Question Pop Quiz
Question
#1: When are you most
likely to sustain a use or training injury?
“Duh, Mark, whenever
I put the body under repeated or unusual stress that results in said injury.”
Question #2: Preferred trained responses are more likely
to emerge after long inculcation—True or False?
“Um, true. Mark, these
are too easy, you got anything better to offer than this?”
Maybe. Indulge me for
a few more paragraphs.
So, trained patterns,
be they patterns of movement, patterns of behavior, or even cognitive grooves
are more likely to emerge than non-trained patterns.
In essence, what we do
more of is likely the best predictor for future manifestation.
If we have never
bothered to break an egg, we will be most unlikely to suddenly manifest deft
single-handed egg-breaking into a wisely warmed omelet skillet with finesse.
What we do
not exercise/practice does not appear spontaneously.
If we regularly practice
annoyance at trivialities in the mundane world, we can hardly expect that this “training
for umbrage” will dissipate under true and more robust stressors.
“How you train
is how you will fight.”
“How you
move is how you move.”
“How you
behave is…”
We are all reading
from the same hymn, I wager.
What we train with
alacrity and regularity is the likely Pavlovian response to future similar or
more robust triggers.
Train/practice a movement/behavior/cognitive
groove seldom or with weak emotional content well, it’s a crap shoot as to whether
or not the seldom used becomes the vital use.
“Past performance
is the best predictor of future behavior.”
The preceding sentence
is also known as “Return to Base Rate” in cognitive behavioral circles.
It simply is yet another
iteration of, “What you see today is likely what you’ll get tomorrow + or – small
deviations off of an individual’s base behavior.”
With this knowledge that
I wager we all know and feel in our guts we are wise to train today what we
desire in the tomorrows.
Robust triggers, true
stressors, or never hoped for chaos will result in behavioral
and physical entropy.
That is, we will never
perform at our absolute best when times are at their absolute worst. There
will be physical and behavioral degradation.
We strive for the “perfect”
in the best of times to retain a bit of “Not too shabby” in the worst of times.
Train/exercise/groove
poor performance in the best of times, when it goes bad, well, there’s no place
to go but down.
Major-General J.F.C.
Fuller offered the following in his work Training Soldiers for War, 1914.
“An army is still a
crowd, though a highly organized one. It is governed by the same laws…and under
the stress of war is ever tending to revert to its crowd form. Our object in peace
is so to train it that the reversion will become extremely slow.”
If we substitute our
own crowd of behaviors, movements, predominant thoughts for Major-General
Fuller’s army/crowd we have the same message of training to combat the inevitability
of entropy.
Training
Scars
In military combative
parlance, a “training scar” is any behavior in the training environment that may
accompany our desired response to our detriment.
Two
examples, one benign, one less so.
The Benign—UFC 112, Matt Hughes vs. Renzo Gracie.
Mr. Hughes is doing
mighty fine in this bout. [He does win it soundly.]
At one point, the affable
Mr. Gracie finds himself leg-kicked to the mat [again] and reaches for Matt
Hughes’s hand to assist his rise.
Mr. Hughes does so,
then once Renzo is on his feet, Hughes’ seems to have a look on his face of, “What
did I just do?”
I wager both gregarious
gents train with the protocol of being gentleman with their training partners
and give one another a hand up after takedown drills.
Mr. Hughes aiding Mr.
Gracie to his feet in the midst of a high-stakes bout for pay is a training scar.
An adjunct behavior [aiding partners of off the mat] that attached itself to
the desired behavior of getting the takedown.
The Fatal
Example From a law enforcement
security camera.
An officer is confronted
by a weapon-wielding thug, he ably knocks the weapon from the attacker’s grasp,
then…
Bends over, picks up
the weapon and hands it back to the thug, who then promptly shoots him.
The officer suffered
the unlucky burden of a polite training scar. Likely he has performed many a disarm
with affable partners and they kindly and with civilized cultivation pick up
and hand the mock-weapon back to the assisting friend.
“How we train is
how we will fight.”
Susu’ana Ekasahpan’a
In many indigenous warrior
traditions this separation of training from all else in life is anathema.
There is to be no separation
from desired behavior in “training time” and all other times.
In fact, there is no
“training session.”
Those who thought in
terms of, “This is warrior training,” “Now, this is physical conditioning,” “Now,
I’m doing meditation,” “Now, I make time for worship,” et cetera were, in
the Comanche tradition, called Susu’ana Ekasahpan’a, or “Sometime
Warriors.”
Along with this
concept of “No Separation” was “Always Preparation.”
Back to
our first Pop Quiz Question
When are
you most likely to sustain a use or training injury?
To “separated minds” use
or training injuries are thought of in terms of “I tweaked my shoulder rolling
the other day,” or “I gotta go easy on squats till I get past this twinge
in the hip.”
The “separated mind”
sees use as being confined to these limited designated training times.
The “Always Prepared”
mind realizes that we use the body not just during scheduled use but, well, all
the damn time.
Sitting is use. Standing
is use. Walking is use. Lying down is use. Bending over to pick up a dropped
sock is use.
All are movement
patterns of habitual grooves that reflect our acquired lifetime of physical and
cognitive habits. Our lifetime of trained responses.
The “separated mind”
will boast of seeking the “best” way of throwing that turnover hook, or getting
under a heavy bar, but give little to no thought to how one sits in a chair
while we raconteur with loved ones, or how one walks to the mailbox.
This mind of the “Always
Warrior” embodies much of what we see within the science of how the human body
moves. [Physical Intelligence: The Science of How the Body and the Mind Guide Each Other Through Life by Scott Grafton is a fine introduction to
this mode of thought.]
The “Always
Warrior” and the current science seems to point out that many of our aches and
pains are less the gym-tweaks than the return-to-base-rate modes of use/movement/thinking
that occupy most of our existence.
Perhaps our persistent
hip-pain is less about finding the perfect running stride than it is from the just-out-of-kilter
posture we adopt when standing, sitting, or lying down.
Perhaps the gym won’t
fix the training scar of our “Gamer’s Neck” but the “use-therapy” of discontinuing
this persistent posture is just what the Always Warrior doctor ordered.
The Always Warrior sees
movement, all movement as an opportunity for training.
The Always Warrior has
an eye in mind of controlling General Fuller’s “crowd” no matter the activity.
In indigenous warrior culture
we can find ready rules for use in the everyday training of “Suakhet’u,” “Nemito,”
Kaht’i,” Kanabai’t’u,” “Habit’u,” & “Kwanu’itu.” [Breathing, Walking,
Sitting, Standing, Lying Down, Ascending or Descending Movement.]
To clarify, we are
talking about an Always Warrior’s attention to movement in mundane everyday
use. There is nothing in this tradition reflective of Movnat or other such
modes of physical expression. These are all worthy schools of thought, but they
exceed the bounds of the subtle distinction of “This is life, not that”
of the “Always” tradition. Likely, a point beyond the expressive powers of
this author—best seen and experienced as in our Suakhet’u Program.]
All movement
can be an opportunity for training.
All movement
can also be an opportunity for a training scar.
We manifest
what we train persistently.
May we
choose wisely.
[The aspects of “Always
Warrior” movement are covered in an adjunct to The Suakhet’u Program.]
In
The Black Box Project we provide old-school combat nitty-gritty straight
from the historical record, and yes, it is empirically verified or it ain’t in.
Comments
Post a Comment