Skip to main content

Kid McCoy's Corkscrew Punch by Mark Hatmaker


The man born as Norman Selby in 1872, who later becomes Charles “Kid” McCoy (another fighter’s name that he casually adopted as his own,) who later took on the nom de ring “The Corkscrew Kid,” and then eventually, and simply, “Kid McCoy” was not a good man. He was a con man, a thief, a cheat, and a hustler. His out of the ring exploits could fill a book of nefarious deeds, but despite all this thuggish and disreputable baggage you can’t take away the fact that he was one of the slickest boxers to step into the ring.

Selby, McCoy, or whatever name he was going by on any given day won the vacant middleweight title with a knockout in the 15th round of Dan Creedon in 1897. He never bothered to defend the title, but don’t let that winning of a vacant title and lack of title defense allow you to assume McCoy was inactive or yellow. On the contrary, he was active as hell, and seemingly fearless. Consider the following.

In 1896, the year prior to picking up the middleweight belt he knocked out welterweight champion Tommy Ryan, a move that would seemingly make him the champion but he never claimed the welterweight title.

On the evening of November 12th, 1897 he knocked out George LaBlanche and Beach Ruble both on the same night—first round knockouts of both men.

The years 1897-1898 saw him on a 13 consecutive knockout streak.

December 2nd, in the year of 1901 Kid McCoy didn’t just fight three men in one night, he knocked all three of them out.

Let’s also have a look at some of the men McCoy faced singly. Keep in mind McCoy was a natural middleweight but he took on and often did quite well against the following men: Joe Choynski, Tom Sharkey, Peter Maher, Jack Root, Philadelphia Jack O’Brien, Jack “Twin” Sullivan, Gus Ruhlin, and the estimable James. J. Corbett. These men were all vaunted heavyweights of the day, but McCoy had no problem saying yes to the bouts.

What McCoy lacked in morals and ethics he more than made up for in grit and power.

McCoy could be less than ethical inside the ring but we’ll leave those stories for another day, instead let’s focus on what gave him the nickname “The Corkscrew Kid.”

McCoy, claims to have invented an altogether brand-new punch that he dubbed the “corkscrew.” He would tell many tales about where and how he developed it over the years always varying details here and there. In some incidences it was shown to him by a “Chinaman” [his words, not mine] and in another version it’s a lesson he picked up watching his kitten play with a cloth toy he was dangling in front of it.

The “corkscrew” is essentially a way to take your standard boxing repertoire and add a bit of twist at the end that can add some slashing/tearing action if timed correctly with the twist occurring upon the punch’s impact.

McCoy claimed (and yeah, again highly doubtful, considering the source) that he could use the corkscrew tactic and punch a bag of cement and eventually grind it into a fine powder. Again, doubtful, but a mighty good story.

Numerous opponent’s both horizontal and vertical could testify to being poleaxed and/or cut by McCoy’s trademark tool, but before we get into the mechanics of how to throw the corkscrew ourselves let’s not forget that McCoy’s version may have had a little bit of extra help.

He would wrap his hands in mounds of friction tape to give him some extra heft and “grab” allowing him to club and tear skin all the better. I will say that this is one of his “nicer” less than honest tactics inside the ring. Again, stories for another day.
[For Drills and specific applications see our book Boxing Like the Champs and the DVD Boxing Like a Champ.]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Warrior Awareness Drills by Mark Hatmaker

THE Primary Factor in self-protection/self-defense is situational awareness. Keeping in mind that crime is, more often than not, a product of opportunity, if we take steps to reduce opportunity to as close to nil as we can manage we have gone a long way to rendering our physical tactical training needless [that’s a good thing.]
Yes, having defensive tactical skills in the back-pocket is a great ace to carry day-to-day but all the more useful to saving your life or the lives of loved ones is a honed awareness, a ready alertness to what is occurring around you every single day.
Here’s the problem, maintaining such awareness is a Tough job with a capital T as most of our daily lives are safe and mundane [also a good thing] and this very safety allows us to backslide in good awareness practices. Without daily danger-stressors we easily fall into default comfort mode.
A useful practice to return awareness/alertness to the fore is to gamify your awareness, that is, to use a series of specific…

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner.
A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground.
The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level.
It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.]
For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down.
I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelling] starting at the top, t…

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “But what if…”


Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “but what if…” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.


The “but what if…” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “but what if…” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario.


Predator: Do what I say and I won’t hurt you.


Or, some other such promise to the victim.


Now, these sorts of …