Skip to main content

Quantifying Grace Under Pressure by Mark Hatmaker

[This offering is an excerpt from the No Second Chance Book of Drills available only to RAW Subscribers.]

NO SECOND CHANCE BOOK OF DRILLS
ASSIGNMENT SET #20

Mark Hatmaker

www.extremeselfprotection.com



HOMEWORK PROTOCOL: Upon the completion of each written-assignment, simply email it back. Drills requiring video evaluation can be sent via Private YouTube Channel link. We will provide an evaluation (and follow-up assignment if need be) before proceeding to the next assignment.



“FIRE DRILLS” There is a Special Ops axiom that we need to keep in mind at all times throughout our training: “Never do anything for the first time in combat.” In other words, no passive consumption of the material; everything (everything) must be drilled, drilled, drilled.



It is with the above mantra in mind that we approach all the drills and exercises in this material.



Quantifying “Grace Under Pressure” Stage 1



As good self-defense practitioners, as effective human beings, and as good animals effective coping strategies are key.  



Often, we put maximum focus on the “nuts and bolts” of tactics or get deep in the weeds of theoretical strategy without a commensurate amount of time priming the limbic system, the emotional coloring that will fuel our hard work more effectively, or wind-up hamstringing our performance despite all of our cognitive and physical work.



The Calm Cool Collected individual [CCC here on out] exhibits what Ernest Hemingway called “grace under pressure.” [The Full quote is “Courage is grace under pressure.”] Hemingway knew of what he spoke. He backed up his machismo bluster with acts and deeds that required an intimate relationship with this definition.



Quantifiable Information vs. “Good Idea.”



Many of us already have coping strategies, skills, techniques we use when confronted with stressful situations, however that may be defined but…and this is key, how many of those “coping strategies” have been quantified to ensure that they do what we assume they will do?



A coping strategy that is never practiced, one that is shelved in the back of the mind is unlikely to be accessed when dire circumstances requires its immediate use.



As practitioners of combat sports, or self-protection tactics many of us are no strangers to stress-testing tactics. After all, if a tool does not work under stress or in chaotic situations it is not a tool at all, but a detriment to your game that has wasted time [i.e., life] that could have been used honing more effective skills.



I submit that we must put our stress-coping strategies under the same empirical microscope that we would submit all other aspects of training.



If we haven’t, we may be wasting our time with mental or actual lip service that serves no purpose.



With the above in mind I offer a series of subjective empirical tests to allow you to:

·        Separate aspects of the autonomic nervous system and individual function under normal conditions.

·        Quantify “normal” or average function.

·        Apply stressors to determine how the autonomic system fluctuates under load, under stress.

·        Run multi-day tests to stress the system and then apply a variety of “coping strategies” under measured circumstances.

At the end of the series of tests the individual will have a better idea of just how much control they do or not have over the individual aspect of the autonomic system. They will have tested a variety of “coping” tactics to know which do and do not work for them.






Equipment

·        Yourself

·        A Partner

·        Stopwatch

·        Stair-step

Day 1

·        Sit quietly and breathe normally for 5-minutes. Make no attempt to alter your breathing in any way, simply do what your lungs do all day long.

·        While doing so have a partner record how many inhalations you make for each 30-second interval.

·        At the end of 5-minutes you will have 10-recorded inhalation numbers written down, one for reach 30-second interval.

·        Next execute a Harvard Step-Test, that is, step the right foot onto the step, followed by the left, right foot down, followed by the left. That is one repetition.

·        Have your observer count the total number of steps [I use a pitch-counter for this.]

·        Record the total number of steps completed in 2-minutes.

·        After the Step Test, immediately have a seat and breath normally for 5-minutes. Make no attempt to alter your breathing, simply allow you heavier breathing to give way to normal breathing. The 5-minutes duration will be enough time to chart how long it takes your respiration rate to return to our first recorded number which was your resting respiration rate. Your recorder/observer will count the number of respirations in each 30-second interval and record these.

Day 2

·        Skip the first 5-minute test from Day 1 that determined your Resting Respiration Rate and proceed directly to the step test for 2-minutes.

·        Then immediately have a seat for 5-minutes. This time you are actively attempting to return your respiration to your initial Resting Respiration Rate [or better.] You may use any method you wish: mantra, CO2 blow-off, thinking “calm” what have you. The key is to make an active attempt to gain control of post-stress breathing as rapidly and smoothly as possible.

·        Your recorder will record respirations every 30-seconds.

Days 3-12

·        Repeat Day 2’s protocol on the remaining dozen days.

·        You may alter respiration control techniques daily if you wish, or stay with one or two that seem to work for you, but the key is to find out A) How much post-stress control over respiration you actually have; B) Which tactics do and do not work for you C) How quickly and smoothly you can make these work for you.



“Grace Under Pressure” 24-Day Test, Number 1-Part 2



For the next dozen days, take your Validated Respiration Control Tactic to the world, your day-to-day life.

·        Notice when you might be chest breathing in the car, and apply your validated tactic.

·        Use your validated tactic as you enter a room.

·        Use as a post-training recovery.



In short, use it in as many situations as you can conjure. Once we know what does work for us as individuals it does us little good if we fail to “to take it to the streets” so to speak.



Daily record any observations you have about the use of your validated tactic in your real-world day-to-day.



By making a further 12-day commitment following the initial test period, we are better likely to deeply seat the validated tactic so that we may call on it if/when actual shit hits actual fans.



[Parts 2-8 will push the boundaries of our Autonomic Control Testing. There’s more to calm cool and collected than breathwork.]



PS-I am often asked once I offer this assignment, “Are there some tactics that work better than others?” Oh, indeed, but rather than me telling you “Just do this” find out for yourself. I find that the hands-on aspect of the testing process continuing on to the further dozen days of subjective application does more for the individual than any “received wisdom.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Warrior Awareness Drills by Mark Hatmaker

THE Primary Factor in self-protection/self-defense is situational awareness. Keeping in mind that crime is, more often than not, a product of opportunity, if we take steps to reduce opportunity to as close to nil as we can manage we have gone a long way to rendering our physical tactical training needless [that’s a good thing.]
Yes, having defensive tactical skills in the back-pocket is a great ace to carry day-to-day but all the more useful to saving your life or the lives of loved ones is a honed awareness, a ready alertness to what is occurring around you every single day.
Here’s the problem, maintaining such awareness is a Tough job with a capital T as most of our daily lives are safe and mundane [also a good thing] and this very safety allows us to backslide in good awareness practices. Without daily danger-stressors we easily fall into default comfort mode.
A useful practice to return awareness/alertness to the fore is to gamify your awareness, that is, to use a series of specific…

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner.
A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground.
The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level.
It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.]
For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down.
I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelling] starting at the top, t…

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “But what if…”


Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “but what if…” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.


The “but what if…” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “but what if…” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario.


Predator: Do what I say and I won’t hurt you.


Or, some other such promise to the victim.


Now, these sorts of …