Skip to main content

Mark on Shootists, Gunhawks, Pistoleers, & Other Ranahans by Mark Hatmaker

 


The following question, from good man, Ron Casas, prompts what follows…

“Do you have a favorite, Old Western Gun fighter ( Pistoleros)?”

My child answer [or Brian Regan answer] is I have many favorites. 2-3 dozen come to mind immediately, but I find I am constantly expanding “My Favorite.”

I work Western firearms 6-days per week when I’m in town.

Just as with our Black Box pugilism, wrestling, rough ‘n’ tumble and vicious weaponry array I have adjusted my firearm method to “historical recreation” or schoolyard “play pretend.”

I pick a human-target, so to speak, and for that week of drills/scenarios, seek to emulate what they did right, what they advocated, and in some cases, what to avoid when it finally went toes-up.

For Example—This Week’s Target is George W. Flatt.

·        Flatt, a fellow Tennessean, wound up in Caldwell, Kansas.

·        Flatt had worked variously as a saloon keeper, range detective, and “law officer” which often meant, when something hairy was going on, a deputy could call on George to back his play.

·        Flatt wore two tie-down guns, a little rarer than the movies would have us believe but, and this is what fascinates me, he could hit with both under duress.

July 7, 1879, Caldwell, Kansas.

·        It’s a Monday afternoon and two cowboys from the Cimarron Strip, George Wood and Jake Adams show up at the Occidental Saloon and begin to “enjoy themselves.”

·        The two wound up “enjoying themselves” into the street and firing their guns willy-nilly.

·        Constable W.C. Kelly and Deputy John Wilson confront them.

·        Wood and Adams head back into the saloon and refuse to come out or surrender their weapons.

·        Kelly and Wilson “posse up” with two citizens W.H. Kiser and George Flatt.

·        The four enter the Occidental. Guns are demanded to be handed over.

·        Wood and Adams pull their weapons again and say “You hand yours over.”

·        Flatt replies, “I’ll die first.”

·        Wood and Adams sought to accommodate.

·        The first shot whizzed by Flatt and grazed Kiser’s temple who stood behind him.

·        Flatt drew both pistols, Wood lunged for the door, Flatt snaps two shots, one goes wild, the second clips off the end of Wood’s forefinger, tearing off the trigger of his gun, passed though both lungs before coming out under his right shoulder blade. [Such post-shooting replays were common in newspapers of the day. See Glendon Swarthout’s novel “The Shootist” for an excellent fictional portrayal of this practice.]

·        The impact rolled Wood into the street where he died.

·        Almost simultaneously Flatt fired with his off-hand and hit Adams in his right side. The slug tore through his body and lodged in the wall.

·        Adams fired back as he was hit, missed Flatt and grazed Wilson’s wrist.

·        Wilson fired twice hitting Adams in the head and stomach.

·        Adams dropped to the floor firing one more shot that hit Wilson in the leg before dying.

It is remarkable to me that Flatt could get off three shots from two guns, firing at two different moving targets while under fire himself.



The Lesson Plan

·        Fast double poker-chip draw so that both weapons are at presentation before the chip hits. See here for how to add Poker Chip draws to your own training with any weapon. https://indigenousability.blogspot.com/2019/11/speed-in-weapon-acquisition-poker-chip.html

·        Double thumb-bust fire with the good hand [as one would expect you should be able to do.]

·        And get at least one quality single out of the off-hand.

·        Stay in close,  and aim to gradually increase distance by a pace until a bit of smoothness is felt.

Of course, I will lack the facing down two wild men with guns aspect, and I’m thankful for it.

But, long story short. That is my method for how I work with my “favorites.”

If you dig such historical recreations and applied methodology, well, I can assure you that is what The RAW/Black Box Project is all about.

Researched to the nth degree, then applied for veracity and utility, and then tied up in a pretty instructional bow just for you.

To stand in the footsteps of such Hombres or for more info, see here:

https://indigenousability.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-black-box-project-by-mark-hatmaker.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner. A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground. The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level. It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.] For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down. I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelli