Skip to main content

The True Combination Man, or “Driving Three Corners Down” by Mark Hatmaker

 



Today’s sermon seeks to define as purely as possible what it means to be a Combination Man/Combination Fighter in the strict old school definition of this historical fighting beast, and not merely a dual sport athlete or cross-trainer or one who mixes a bit o’ this, and a bit o’ that.

But first…a little gonads to the wall old school racing history.

Barney Oldfield.

You know the name?

He was America’s first bona fide celebrity driver.

How long ago was this?

Well, when Henry Ford was wanting to provide PR for his vehicles, he entered one of his cars in a race in 1901 in Grosse Point, Michigan. Mr. Ford himself drove his car against experienced racer, Alexander Winton.

Winton owned the first seven laps of the 10-mile race, but Ford pulled ahead in the 8th and took the victory.

The speed of these vehicles on the dirt track? Around 45MPH.

Before we guffaw at this speed thinking of our easily besting that in our comfort controlled, performance designed machines, ponder doing the same thing in proto-vehicles with ZERO safety features and none of the bells and whistles of smoothly designed engineering that evens out our copious driving mistakes. Add to that these being open vehicles, that is, no roof, no roll-bars, no belts, no nada. Just you, in one of these bouncing beasts whipping around an unstable dirt track at 45 MPH.

Any of us who have driven at speed in a less than ideal mode of locomotion can easily conjure the “Ahh, that is quite a Hoss feat” magnitude of the event.

Just picture how it feels to hit 45 in your Ford Taurus, 45 across wakes on a Jet-Ski, and 45 skiing downhill and you see, speed and safety are relative to the vehicle.

Ford, the winner, expressed himself thusly after his experience, “Boy I’ll never do that again, I was scared to death.”

So, Ford the honest, went looking for a driver to show off his machines. In 1902 he approached Bernd “Eli” Oldfield, a successful bicycle racer [and occasional boxer] to drive for him.



Oldfield had never driven in a road race before and wound up winning handily versus experienced competitors, this starting him off on a new career of whizzing around dirt tracks, perfecting his game and engaging in more than a few “stunts” including being the first person to race up the dirt road that led to the 14,110-feet summit of Pike’s Peak.

Barney Oldfield’s name and image were known to all. Easily recognizable in his racing togs which were a scarf wrapped around his throat and an unlit cigar clamped between his teeth.

Why the unlit cigar? To keep his teeth from rattling together and breaking off in the rough terrain of the track.

See? I told you, safety gear. What safety gear?

When asked how he does what he does, Oldfield offered this, “Most guys see no further than just in front of their hood, or the corner they’re driving, Me? I’m driving three corners down.”

There’s likely more to Mr. Oldfield’s success than that but is a perfect jumping off point for today’s sermon.

Modern research using pupil-tracking bears out Mr. Oldfield’s advice. Drivers fitted with pupil-tracking helmets reveal that the smoothest and most successful drivers have a “long view” of the track or course, the worst or least successful handlers on a track were looking closer to their vehicle, and middle-of-the-pack drivers were middle-distance gazers.

Combination Fighters & Dual Sport Athletes

In the Americas from around 1860 onward into the 1930s an athlete who competed in both boxing and wrestling was considered a combination fighter, one that could perform adeptly at either sport.

That thumbnail definition leads some to believe that mere proficiency at the twin rulesets made one a combination fighter.

Not so. In this time period, both sports were high in popularity and engaged in by many. Many a wrestler augmented his training with heavy boxing [William Muldoon comes to mind rapidly] and many a fistic luminary used wrestling in their training camps [John. L. Sullivan, Bob Fitzsimmons, and Jack Dempsey spring to the fore here.]



And yet none of these men regarded themselves as a combination man.

Yes, they were able scrappers in their side-game but they recognized that a combination fighter was different than merely being adept at both boxing and wrestling.

They used the term combination fighter to designate a different beast altogether.

In the original sense of the word, a combination fighter was one who could “drive three corners down.”

A fighter who did not see the mere use of a punch to set up a leg dive as worthy of the title.

They thought of dual sport athletes as something akin to duelists, that is, two folks who agree that they will remain standing and trade with whatever art, heart, and science they posses or jockey for takedowns, pins and submissions with commensurate art, heart, and science.

Even those who engaged in mixed-matches where the rulesets blend did not necessarily bestow combination fighter status.

The experienced could still see the gears shifting, the “driving just in front of the hood” as it were.

True combination fighters were those that could see the commonalties in each and every aspect of the game. They could read 3 punches in as to who was making a “boxing dominant” attempt at a combination. They could read the way a a hand whipped off of an outside step if one was “wrestling steeped” or truly a combination thinker.

The early definition saw this noticeable [to wise eyes] shifting of gears between sports as a fighter who is “muscle set.”

A fighter who is “set” in old school parlance, was steeped in one discipline more than another. [Mr. Jordan in basketball—Performance par excellence! Mr. Jordan in baseball, would have been called muscle-set by the old-timers.]

A mere mix was not the sought for goal, the tactic of one motion that could be both, where one becomes all was the admired end.

That definition leads to this question…

If the skill of a combination fighter was so valued, why did it fade into the historical background?”

A good question with two likely answers.

Answer One-Lack of economic incentive. For whatever reason, combination matches did not catch the same cash-on-the barrelhead fire as did straight boxing and wrestling matches.

One, must make a living, so pick and choose.



Answer Two-The excuse/reason/assumption of “set” muscles was the other. As fighters were expected to specialize fewer and fewer wrestlers boxed in their training regimen and fewer and fewer boxers wrestled in their camps.

The faddish thought in the late 30’s began to turn towards thinking cross-pollination “set” the fighter too much and stole time, resources, and reflexes from the monied proposition.

With that in mind, we devolve the definition, with combination fighter as an epitomized combat athlete to using dual sports to prepare for both sports to worries that training one or the other will “set” the fighter in question.

The avid historical recreator will strive for this pure and early definition of combination fighter and see thru the smoke of mere dual or triple sport training.

This fighter will strive to see far past the hood, look beyond the middle distance and drive three corners down.

In The Black Box Project we provide Combination Fighting nitty-gritty straight from the historical record.

For skinny on The Black Box Project

[For techniques, tactics, and strategies of Rough and Tumble Combat, Old-School Boxing, Mean-Ass Wrestling, Street-Ready Frontier Scrapping & Indigenous Ability culled from the historical record see the RAW Subscription Service, or stay on the corral fence with the other dandified dudes and city-slickers. http://www.extremeselfprotection.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner. A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground. The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level. It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.] For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down. I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelli