Skip to main content

When You Want to Break the Rules, Look to the Rule-Breakers by Mark Hatmaker

 


This offering is best read in conjunction with the three prior offerings:

Leg-Breakers, Street Dentists & Enforcers

The Empirical Fighter: Rules for the SeriousCombatant

The BlackBox Project

[The accompanying video provides just one aspect of how small tweaks to standard systems change the game—trust me, these tweaks abound to make all movement “hot and nervy.”.]

Let us establish our priors.

Combat Sports, be they boxing, wrestling, MMA, JJ, Muay Thai, et cetera are rough and ready endeavors.

No arguments there.

A sport, a skill, a study, any area of focus is improved by frequent practice and ready use. That is, our badminton player who plays 4-5 days per week is likely more facile with a blistering fast shuttlecock return than, say, someone like me, who plays at best, one afternoon a summer.

Or we can look to boxers, circa 1920s, ratcheting on average over 100 fights in a career, and many more off-the-record bouts in clubs and smokers giving some double their official fight tally.

These fighters, with constant exposure to the ins and outs of the game, adhered to the frequency of use rule and had more tips, tricks, and tactics in the noggin’ than the fighter who pulls, at best, 4-5 fights per year.

Again, regarding the 20’s fighters of our example, we are not talking training time, we are talking bouts. Some fighters were taking on average a fight every two weeks—if we add corresponding gym time, we can imagine how much more familiarity with all matters fistic such an athlete would be than our, in comparison, quarterly dabbler.

A sport, be it badminton, boxing, or free-diving has designated boundaries, strictures, rulesets.

Be those rules, no hair pulling, don’t clip the net, or “keep it on the face of the glove, Boys!” the well-understood rules are what make an endeavor a sport and not a bit of chaos resembling a sport.

To excel in a given endeavor, athletes play to the boundaries of the game in question. Their thinking and their performance become bounded by the black and white words in the rulebook.

The best athletes in any endeavor, understand those margins and play to and exploit those defined margins.

So, with all of that in mind, if we have an athlete who understands those margins well. Can color inside the lines just fine but…prefers the vast territory beyond the lines of acceptable play then when I match my game against his our hers that lives in a world of chaotic freedom of expression I am hamstrung by my own bounded training.

My mind and body have grooved to a rulebook of acceptable play. I may recognize immediately that the game has gone non-kosher and outside of the lines and decide that I shall “go beyond” as well, but…

My mind and body have been grooved; they have been trained to the acceptable boundaries. I must make cognitive effort to step outside and beyond what has been grooved, whereas, my free-wheeling opponent has no such cognitive boundary to overcome. [Again, I would urge you to have a read of The Empirical Fighter: Rules for the SeriousCombatant to make sure we understand the laws of specificity.]

If our free-wheeling player also has the benefit of frequent pragmatic application of the free-wheeling mindset and arsenal in real proving grounds, then I am doubly lost.

When we take a rule-breaker with the fight record of a 20’s fighter in their own domain we have an entirely new animal. The Law of Frequent Use will make “the beyond” not mere tools to snatch at when the going gets tough but the first choices at any given opportunity.

A rule-breaker that takes an agreed upon rule-set and sanctioned tactics who then alters them, augments them, revises them into a new animal altogether, is a formidable animal themself.

I will now re-tread a bit of territory covered in Leg-Breakers, Street Dentists & Enforcers, where we turned our eye on the Boxing-Mob connection.

The connection between old school boxers, old school wrestlers of the legitimate sort and those who moonlighted a bit in both worlds is vast and almost astonishing in its roster.

If we add those who never competed in the legitimate game but were considered fearsome nevertheless by those who did play at top levels in the sportive side of things, the roster quadruples.

The observations that follow from Joseph “Donnie Brasco” Pistone are simply from one voice in the know.



We could easily add hundreds more like observations from the historical record of folks saying gangsters, mobsters, wiseguys, hard bastards, hooligans and thugs knew what they were doing, and, in most cases, knew more than the sport-saturated will ever know.

[Mr. Pistone’s observation is echoed in testimony from the 1750’s forward on both sides of the pond—never forget Ronnie & Reggie Kray were just two notable examples of folks who took what they learned in the ring and upped it outside the game. The following holds for boxing and wrestling; scufflers from The Barbary Coast to The Five Points put their skills to less than savory use. Gerald Kersh’s 1938 novel, Night and the City, although ostensibly about corruption in the wrestling game, also had a knowing eye on “performers who moonlighted.”]



I turn it over to Joseph D. Pistone, a man who went deep undercover with the Mob. A brave man who knows of what he speaks.

When you grow up on the streets, you get into a lot of street fights. No way around it, plain and simple. That’s why a lot of your champion boxers grew up on the streets. In Paterson, New Jersey, I got into situations all the time where the only way out was with my fists. The first time you punch someone in the face, you are almost shocked by the violence of it, the blood, the crunching sound, the breaking bones. After that, it’s a piece of cake. I punched a lot of people in my day, almost always in situations where it was punch or be punched.

“One thing I knew not to do was go looking for a street fight. Why provoke a fight when the guy might have a knife or a gun? If, however, you sense that a fight is inevitable, you must make sure you get in the first punch. Once I started hanging out with wiseguys, though, I was surprised at how they went around almost eager to mix it up. They knew they had a tremendous advantage over almost everyone who crossed their paths: an utter fearlessness about fighting. Wiseguys do everything with their fists: fighting is a way to negotiate, send a message, settle a debt, even have a little fun on a slow night. I saw wiseguys beat up waiters, shopkeepers, cab drivers, you name it. And I never saw a wiseguy lose a fight. If you ever have the misfortune to be punched by a wiseguy, you will not soon forget it. I got punched by wiseguys a couple of times. They punch pretty good.”

Mr. Pistone goes on to say that the fights are not of the bar-room dust-up poseur, throw a few “are we done here?” variety. Here he refers to the intensity and the “educated” use of force.

“I have seen wiseguys beat the bloody hell out of people. It takes a while to do,…but if you know where and how to punch a guy, believe me, you can kill him.”

He is just one of many insiders who refer to Street-Dentistry as being a different animal than boxing. What looks like standard punching or boxing correlates, is often just that, something that looks like it. Often the resemblance ends there.

There is also the frequency of actual use of the skill set which further hones tactics and strategy. An increased exposure to tool-honing opportunity that recalls the fight records of the 1920’s “in the know” fighter.

Mr. Pistone on frequency and provocation.

Hell, people have been savagely beaten for accidentally bumping into wiseguys.

So, if you get into some kind of altercation with someone who looks like a wiseguy, walk away. No, run away. Wiseguys love getting into fights, and they never lose.”

To conclude, I repeat, actual street arsenals may resemble their sporting corelates, but the historical and tactical record reveals that similarities end at appearances. Those who assume otherwise may make a deadly mistake.

For our own protection, to confront the predators and rule-breakers of the world, we must allow our own education in rule-breakers to come from those who know intimately how to break the rules. And not just bending the rules of a sport.

[Want details, tips, and tactics on how to throw hands, dirty clinch, and ground crush like the rule-breakers mentioned?

In The Black Box Project we provide old-school combat nitty-gritty straight from the historical record, and yes, it is empirically verified or it ain’t in.

For skinny on The Black Box Project itself.

[For techniques, tactics, and strategies of Rough and Tumble Combat, Old-School Boxing, Mean-Ass Wrestling, Street-Ready Frontier Scrapping & Indigenous Ability culled from the historical record see the RAW Subscription Service, or stay on the corral fence with the other dandified dudes and city-slickers. http://www.extremeselfprotection.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or

The Original Roadwork by Mark Hatmaker

  Mr. Muldoon Roadwork. That word, to the combat athlete, conjures images of pre-dawn runs, breath fogging the morning air and, to many, a drudgery that must be endured. Boxers, wrestlers, kickboxers the world over use roadwork as a wind builder, a leg conditioner, and a grit tester. The great Joe Frazier observed… “ You can map out a fight plan or a life plan, but when the action starts, it may not go the way you planned, and you're down to the reflexes you developed in training. That's where roadwork shows - the training you did in the dark of the mornin' will show when you're under the bright lights .” Roadwork has been used as a tool since man began pitting himself against others of his species in organized combat. But…today’s question . Has it always been the sweat-soaked old school gray sweat suit pounding out miles on dark roads or, was it something subtler, and, remarkably slower? And if it was, why did we transition to what, and I repeat myself,