Skip to main content

What Early Navy SEALs Can Teach You & Me About Innovation by Mark Hatmaker

 




Let’s start with a definition of the concept of “bricolage.”
Bricolage is, and I quote “something constructed or created from a diverse range of available things.”

We find the term being bandied about in art where “found” objects are used in a creative way.

The term is also used by sociologists and anthropologists who describe how societies and cultures are formed; it is less by a top-down fiat as in “We’re all gonna wear cargo shorts and ballcaps, and use the fork in our left hands” than it is a loose amalgamation of elements that gradually cohere and then concretize into, “Well, that’s just how it’s done.”

We find the concept in engineering where a problem is presented, a mechanical solution is required and the perfect tool or ready tool does not exist nor its constituent parts, so a bit of creativity and tinkering leads to a bricolage answer that fits the bill.

How does bricolage apply to combat systems?

We’ll come back to that.

First, let’s talk Frogmen, the early days of the Navy SEALS.

Let us go back to WWII.

The Pacific Theater of War.

The shadow of the disastrous Tarawa Atoll invasion looms large.

Rear Admiral Richmond Kelly Turner realizes that something different needs to be done on the next invasion target of the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands.

On Tarawa, invasion boats ran aground on coral well offshore, leaving combat-laden marines to wade several hundred yards under heavy fire.

More marines were drowned in unseen sink holes and craters than were killed by enemy fire during the invasion.

Admiral Turner needs better intel than is currently provided so he turns to a tactic recently used for clearing beaches in mainland Europe.

US Navy combat demolition units [NCDUs] were used for beach clearing, Turner seizes two of these teams, sends them to Maui, Hawaii for a crash course in hydrographic reconnaissance, mapping, and obstacle removal skills.

These two teams were redesignated Underwater Demolition Teams [UDTs.]

Back in Kwajalein air reconnaissance shows the Japanese working on a seawall of rock set in concrete with hardwood posts projecting seaward to repel Amtraks and assault boats.

A sea-launched reconnaissance is planned with the two UDT teams, one at high tide and one at low to map the area and plan where destructive charges would need to be set.

At this stage of UDT evolution, these Frogmen forerunners, these proto-SEALs were designated as “walkers” because…

They wore full combat uniforms [including boots], their gear included an inflatable life belt to keep them upright and on the surface, and a lifeline for each man to tether him to their boat.

The UDT mission statement was to “walk/wade” shoreline to examine obstacles.

Swimming was NOT a part of the mission protocol for UDTs at this time.

BTW-The weapons they carried? One heavy knife, either a marine Ka-bar or a navy Mark II.

Why so lightly armed?

UDTs were considered so valuable they were not designated as combat troops.

Get this, the plan to do better than the catastrophe of Tarawa was to send poorly armed waders to “walk” the beach.

Commando beachcombers, if you will.

The best minds sought a solution, and this was the answer.

OK, Mark, neat but where’s this whole bricolage thing?”

Two of the UDT men, Seabee Chief Petty Officer Bill Acheson and Ensign Lewis F. Luehrs thought the wading plan ludicrous.

So, against regulations and the warnings of their commander, the two men stripped down and dove in to swim the beachhead.

These two measured water depths, pinpointed gun emplacements, studied seawall and the log abatis across the entire stretch.

They recorded all on waterproof slates with grease pencils.

Their swimming trip lasted an approximate 45 minutes. They returned to their landing craft, even their disapproving commander was impressed by the intelligence gathered and rushed the men to Admiral Turner’s flagship.

Using the two “rogue swimmer’s” information, Turner altered tactics to Amtraks with heavy treads and shallow drafts over deep-hulled LCVPs [Landing Craft, Vehicles, Personnel] to better roll over coral obstructions.

The invasion was successful, casualties were a fraction of what they were at Tarawa.

These two “rogue” swimmers bucked their intensive training and forever changed how UDTs were utilized.

19 days after the “rogue” swimmers bricolage at Kwajalein, UDT teams swam with goggles at Eniwetok to report obstacles.

Upon Admiral Turner’s return to Pearl Harbor, he reported that the only way to deal with coral and underwater obstacles was to send in swimmers.

Gone were the days of the “Walker.”





The Combat Bricolage Lessons for Us

One—The best training may not always be right for the job at hand. No one doubts the thought put into the “walker” program but…only hindsight may let us see the depth of its folly now.

What high-speed, low-drag well-intentioned, well-designed aspect of our own training is, perhaps, as outmoded as a combat “walker?”

Two—Adapting to circumstances, Acheson and Leuhrs, both evaluated the situation and ditched not only protocol but the given uniform. Bricolage is adapting to the circumstances with what is at hand to provide better results than the smooth plan.

We must ask ourselves, what smooth drill might be bettered by a shake-up, a re-shuffling, or perhaps even a complete discarding?

Will this gi-only training present me with the same opportunities outside of the training arena?

Does this 8-step flow drill actually exist in the wild or am I merely wading in heavy surf while weighted with heavy wet clothing?

Three—Courage to adapt.

Not only did our two “rouge” swimmers adapt, we must note how quickly the “Top Brass” adapted.

A mere 19 days after committing an act warned against by an immediate commander the tactic is whole-heartedly adopted.

The primary lessons of bricolage are examine environments, parse circumstances and commit an action plan that is informed by the elements that are present, not those that are readily available in the sterile confines of well-supplied, scrupulously designed well-intentioned training.

Sometimes going “rogue” changes history and saves lives while history is being changed.

[Want more? See our Training and Research Resources below.]

The Black Box Warehouse

https://www.extremeselfprotection.com/

The Indigenous Ability Blog

https://indigenousability.blogspot.com/

The Rough ‘n’ Tumble Raconteur Podcast

https://anchor.fm/mark-hatmaker



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or

The Original Roadwork by Mark Hatmaker

  Mr. Muldoon Roadwork. That word, to the combat athlete, conjures images of pre-dawn runs, breath fogging the morning air and, to many, a drudgery that must be endured. Boxers, wrestlers, kickboxers the world over use roadwork as a wind builder, a leg conditioner, and a grit tester. The great Joe Frazier observed… “ You can map out a fight plan or a life plan, but when the action starts, it may not go the way you planned, and you're down to the reflexes you developed in training. That's where roadwork shows - the training you did in the dark of the mornin' will show when you're under the bright lights .” Roadwork has been used as a tool since man began pitting himself against others of his species in organized combat. But…today’s question . Has it always been the sweat-soaked old school gray sweat suit pounding out miles on dark roads or, was it something subtler, and, remarkably slower? And if it was, why did we transition to what, and I repeat myself,