Skip to main content

Pirate Boarding Ax Tactics! by Mark Hatmaker

 




Lend an ear me hearties for some delicious red-decked mayhem!

In support of Black Box Volume 33: Pirate Boarding Ax Tactics: The Melee Edition I offer the following historical support.

For a podcast version of this essay--Click Here!

First things first, we are discussing pirate endeavors more than privateer endeavors—a subtle but important distinction between sea raiders.

Your definition of pirate is likely the correct one, that of a ship of villains who have declared “War upon all” and see each sail in the offing as a potential prize ship for plunder.

Whereas a privateer was a ship sailing under a letter of marque, that is, a decree that would allow merchant ships to attack enemy ships in times of war.

It would be as if, let’s say today the United States has declared war against Norway, and each Carnival cruise ship [a British-American company] under a letter of marque would be allowed to attack any Norwegian Cruise ship they come across.

The privateers of old would be prepared for battle whereas the Carnival cruise ship would not. Privateer and pirate ships existed for one thing—plunder.

Pirates plundered as they were thieves and that was the only way to turn a profit and Privateers, were essentially the same thing. Privateers operated under a “purchase” system, that is, if they went into battle, they would not receive combat pay from the crown for fighting, they were expected to plunder the attacked ship’s resources and make what they obtained their pay.

Hence the phrase, “No Purchase, No Pay.”

The lot of privateers was worse than the pirates as the pirates owed no commission whereas from 1589 on, the Crown took 10% of the purchase.

Pirates kept 100%.

BTW-If one has any privateer plans for their next cruise, Privateering was abolished by the Treaty of Paris in 1856.

The Reality of Plunder

Now, some may be thinking what does all this have to do with bad-ass pirate/privateer boarding axe tactics?

My strategic minded ones already see the conundrum of sea-rover battle tactics.

We often picture sea battles in exchanged cannon fire as in the film Master and Commander, or in the novels of Patrick O’Brien or C.S. Forester but…these were sea battles between war ships.

The goal in these instances was victory over plunder.

Plunder could be taken if boarded but…sinking and/or crippling vessels of war was the foremost goal.

To pirates and privateers, a ship at the bottom of the sea means zero return on investment.

Battle tactics must be altered to address minimizing damaging fire to the attacked vessel so that she could stay rails above wave long enough to take all worth taking, often times the ship itself.

Unlike pirate movies where maximum damage is delivered before boarding, the reality was to minimize damage so that anything worth salvaging was taken.

Seamanship and battle-tactics weighed heavily on the piratical mind.

Boarding and man-to-man melee with minimal damage to hull, masts, sail, and rigging was the watchword.

Firing grapeshot, cannister, and cannonade willy-nilly was the way of war-ships not of the pirate.

[Perhaps another day we will delve into the brilliant maneuvering to minimize exchanged fire, fascinating to this sailor but for today…boarding is the watchword.]



“Cutlass Battle!”

When one pictures hand-to-hand fighting, literally a sailing term, sailors being hands, hand-to-hand meaning man to man, not empty hand as it has been perverted to today…when we picture such deck-bound melees we have been helped by cinema to envision scores of men with cutlass in hand.

Yes, the cutlass was in play, but so was a vast variety of weaponry [as to that variety, again, another day.]

But a weapon that held high utility was the boarding axe, which is essentially identical to your standard hatchet.

Some featured the short haft as one finds in today’s camp-axe, others could be more along the extended handle as one finds in most forms of tomahawk.

Notice the Terminology

An axe is an axe, not a boarding axe until it is designated for use in boarding.

A no-brainer there, but often it is overlooked that that single word “boarding” changes the timbre of how this tool is wielded.

A Multiple Use Tool

Before we move to the boarding axe as a weapon let us look to it for its singular utility in the midst of ship and purchase-prize preserving battle.

To board a vessel, one must be close enough to move from one pitching heaving deck in the open sea to another.

This is no easy prospect—all the more so once a deck becomes red-decked—that is blood-slicked.

A common enough footing hazard that buckets of sand were kept at the ready during cannonade to spread over gushing gore to aid surviving hands keeping one’s feet.

During boarding the beard of the axe would be used to hook rail, to provide surer purchase for that precarious step over to the other side.

Pirate boarding axes often were made with a blade side and a poll side [the “hammer” side.] The blade was used to cut non-essential rigging to disable the ship without bringing entire acres of canvas, tons of spar and boom on top of one’s skull.

Needless to say, it takes an experienced seaman to know what is and is not essential on vessels were hundreds of miles of line [rope] could be found doing their mysterious magic of leverage.

The poll-side was used to break down doors and bulkheads during the boarding melee.

The blade of the axe could also be used to chisel out hot cannonballs embedded in timber so that the ball could be pitched overboard and prevent starting a fire.



The “Bible”

Let’s look at one more, perhaps unexpected non-weaponry use of the pirate boarding axe.

Each new crewmember to be accepted into the Brotherhood [the ways of piracy] would be asked to swear to the that ship’s particular articles of conduct.

Instead of a Bible as on a ship of state, the prospective pirate would place his hand upon a boarding axe and swear to the ways of the sea-dog.

It don’t get more cinematic than that!

Melee

A melee by strict definition is a “confused fight.”

This is apt.

Confused is the correct word as confused itself means not only to befuddle but to “fuse” elements generally not meant to be fused together.

This reflects the tight quarters of piratical boarding mayhem.

“Not enough room to swing a cat.”

This sailor’s phrase refers to how tight the quarters are in a hand-to-hand melee.

The “cat” in the melee refers to a cat-o’-nine-tails, a length of hemp cordage crafted in braid or macrame ending in nine “tails” with knotted ends.

During shipboard punishments these would be used to flog/whip the punished one.

It was cruel, vicious and often led to exposed bone and death of the receiver.

To say of a deck battle “There was not enough room to swing a cat” means exactly that. No room to swing the referred to punishment tool AND no room for the use of the boarding axe as a weapon in the swinging chopping sense of the word.

Different tactics must be adapted.

Historical Accuracy vs. Cinema Assumptions

Melees in real battle did not and do not permit the John Wickian dueling we have come to expect.

Zumbrada, flow chains, tit-for-tat did not exist in the wild.

Although not a pirate source let us look to a description of the melee at Tannenberg in 1410 to get at the true flavor of a melee.

“Breaking spears and armour hitting against each other produced such a great clatter and bang, and the clang of swords resounded so loudly, as if some huge rock had collapsed, that even those who were several miles away could hear it. Then knight attacked knight, armour crushed under the pressure of armour, and swords hit faces. And when the ranks closed, it was impossible to tell the coward from the brave, the bold from the slow, because all of them were pressed together, as if in some tangle.”—Jan Dlugosz

Let us keep in mind, this melee was on dry land.

Now picture a pitching, rolling deck on the high seas and let us add miles of rigging and acres of canvas and booms and spars to be preserved and maneuvered around.

Let us add red decks, rolling cannonballs loose from the brass monkey.

Then, then we are getting closer to why what we assume about boarding axes, tomahawks and battleaxes may be wide of the mark.

The ingenious truth of the matter is of far more value for the serious Warrior.

To move from the academic to the axe in hand tactics of these Rovers of the Deep Blue have a look at Black Box Volume 33: Pirate Boarding Ax Tactics: The Melee Edition

For historically accurate and viciously verified Old School Combat Tactics and Conditioning, none of it based on assumption see the following resources.

The Black Box Combat & Conditioning Training Warehouse

The Rough ‘n’ Tumble Raconteur Podcast



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immigrants of all nationalities with a strong contingent of

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “ But what if …”           Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “ but what if …” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.           The “ but what if …” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “ but what if …” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario. Predator : Do what I say and I won’t hurt you. Or

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner. A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground. The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level. It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.] For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down. I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelli