Skip to main content

Rough n Tumble Fight Scenes: Son of Fury by Mark Hatmaker

 


Many martial artists of a certain age have cinema moments to thank for their initial interest in combat arts. Celluloid inspirations have driven countless viewers from popcorn butter-stained theater seats to sweat-smelling dojos and gyms.

Those coming up in the 1970s may have found initial inspiration in Bruce Lee films, or the Shaw Brothers films that popped up on many a Black Belt Theater television program.

[As a child of the 70s, my own cinema “heroes” were the Charles Bronson of Hard Times and Tom Laughlin of the first three Billy Jack films.]

The 1980s launched many a ninja, Chuck Norris, Van Damme, and, dare I say it, Seagal enthusiasts.

One cannot forget Jackie Chan also looms large across the late 70s on up into the early 2000s.

Of more recent vintage we see the Matrix and John Wick franchises acting as modern-day recruiters for burgeoning martial artists.

But we must not forget that prior to the extended “shaky cam” ultra-choreographed, wire-assisted, green-screen excesses we have come to expect, the fight scene also loomed large in early cinema.

The differences being a few.

·        More abbreviated and less baroque choreography.

·        Although less dynamic [not always] to modern eyes the danger factor could be higher due to more barebones technical “assist.’ [No green-screen, no wire work, hell, the airbag for high falls was not developed until the ‘60s. Until then people were falling onto mattresses, scattered hay, spread sand, or in many a Western---just falling.]

And the primary two differences of historical importance, to my eye at least…

·        The fights were reflective of reality—the reality of rough n tumble and less smooth, polished dancer choreographed luster.

·        And….and this is a big And, many of the stunt performers or choreographers were men from that lineage of actual real world tough barroom brawlers, rough n tumblers.

Occasionally we will delve into a fight scene that I consider of historical importance.

Today we turn our attention to the 1942 film Son of Fury: The Story of Benjamin Blake.

This is a South Seas adventure film [popular at the time both on screen and in the pulps] starring Tyrone Power and George Sanders.

We will not delve into the plot; I’ll leave that unspoiled for those who choose to view from title card to end credits.

Let’s turn our attention directly to the combat within.

Let us begin with our two “combatants.”

There were stunt men involved but Power and Sanders were both able to step up for much of what we see.

Our first violent interaction involves a lesson in “fighting dirty.”

It is brief, requires no further remark but it contains a fine lesson in minding range and distance.

We turn our attention to the “re-match” at the end of the film that takes place in a stateroom.

The brawl is pure rough n tumble.

It is choppy, without elegance, a Hollywood take on accuracy.

We must not forget the viewing public of 1942 was not sheltered Millennials, Gen-Xers, or whatever other broods have sprung forth cognomens.

The viewers were grown men and women who have lived through the Depression years, one World War and were in the midst of another.

This was an audience that had actually been in a fistfight at least once in their lives and had witnessed one or two others and, likely, things far worse.

Wirework, 8-beat long choreography, effortlessly fighting multiple opponents would have been laughable to an audience that had actually seen real world beat downs and the rough edges that are part and parcel of a real fight.

In this stateroom fight we have fists thrown, cross-buttock throws, headlocks snagged to pummel, the upright environment is used willy nilly [Garrison Fighting], environmental weapons are used…

In short, this brief wild affair, perhaps “uncool” to today’s videogame-style choreography that reflects the programmer’s dreams as opposed to the programmer’s unlived reality is far more reflective of the real world of both a fight and the experiences of the hard-lived viewers.

Fight Background

The fight was initially planned by director John Cromwell, with the intent to film each punch separately and cut them together.

This ultimately was considered too time consuming, and it was turned over to the stuntmen to brawl it up a little willy-nilly.

And willy-nilly it got, George Sanders stunt double, Jack Stoney broke his hand in the fight.

It must be acknowledged that both Sanders and Power look fine in their close-shots—both could handle athletics.

Sanders stood 6’3” and weighed in at 215. He had been an interscholastic heavyweight boxing champ at Brighton College.

Bonus Scene in the film has Sanders in a bare-knuckle match with actual pro-wrestler Louis Bacigalupi.

Power, a far smaller man, stood 6’ but weighed in at 170 pounds. He was a U.S. Marine Corps pilot who exercised his physique with fencing. He shows these skills off in many a fine film, including two across from George Sanders in 1942’s The Black Swan and 1959s Solomon and Sheba.

The film’s final fight may seem a wee pale compared to today’s kinetic fare but viewed with the proper historical perspective and considering an audience that had seen or experienced real flesh-and-blood in peril, well, then we might see with fresh eyes just how significant this scene is.

[For more behind the scenes views of this film, I direct you to Ted Gill’s article in the January 25, 1942 issue of The SunThere’s Art in Preserving the Hero’s Face in Film Fisticuffs.”]

For all things Rough n Tumble Fighting, including Garrison Fighting and using the environment as weaponry I urge you to browse our store, in particular our Garrison Fighting Black Box Volumes and our Street Defense series.

Resources for Livin’ the Warrior Life

The Black Box Store

The Rough ‘n’ Tumble Raconteur Podcast


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Apache Running by Mark Hatmaker

Of the many Native American tribes of the southwest United States and Mexico the various bands of Apache carry a reputation for fierceness, resourcefulness, and an almost superhuman stamina. The name “Apache” is perhaps a misnomer as it refers to several different tribes that are loosely and collectively referred to as Apache, which is actually a variant of a Zuni word Apachu that this pueblo tribe applied to the collective bands. Apachu in Zuni translates roughly to “enemy” which is a telling detail that shines a light on the warrior nature of these collective tribes.             Among the various Apache tribes you will find the Kiowa, Mescalero, Jicarilla, Chiricahua (or “Cherry-Cows” as early Texas settlers called them), and the Lipan. These bands sustained themselves by conducting raids on the various settled pueblo tribes, Mexican villages, and the encroaching American settlers. These American settlers were often immig...

A Conversation with Neil Melanson by Mark Hatmaker

Here is a chat I had with a good man with a good mind, Neil Melanson. If you are unfamiliar with Neil’s exemplary work he has coached at Xtreme Couture, Alliance MMA, and a HC with the Blackzilians. He is now at gym Genesis Training Academy and Coach of the Filthy Few MMA team. -DVDs out are: Head Hunter, Catchwrestling, and Ground Marshal guard basics  -book Mastering Triangle Chokes -black belt under Karo Parisyan in the Hayastan Grappling System  First things first, Brother Neil, thanks for taking the time to have this chat. Allow me to get another thing out of the way, your book Mastering Triangle Chokes , top-notch. This is high-speed, low-drag stuff all the way. Often there is chaff to be culled through, but you have a linear approach that appeals to the pragmatic streak in me. Excellent work. Thanks a lot man.  You are a real articulate and detailed coach so that means a lot coming from you. Your approach to grappling appeals to my expansiv...

Walk Like a Warrior by Mark Hatmaker

In reading contemporary historical accounts written by soldiers (cavalry and dragoon), settlers, scouts, pioneers, and other citizens of the American frontier 1680s-1880s, I find mention that Native Americans (“Indians” or “Savages” in the accounts) did not walk like “white men.” Their gait, stride, and foot placement is described often in poetic terms as “light” or “light-footed,” “fleet”, “gliding”, and often times “springy” or “spring-like.” These terms while descriptive of the effect do little to tell us the how or why of the gait. We can find clues in accounts given by trackers in any of the myriad “Indian Wars” or skirmishes that riddled the continent in the first few centuries of the settling of the nation. The obvious telltale barefoot or soft impression of a moccasin is often a giveaway that you have a Native American track but this is less so in the moccasined foot as more and more Anglo backwoodsmen adopted this footwear. But there are a few accounts that mention ...