Skip to main content

Two Summonings & a Question Regarding Grit by Mark Hatmaker


Thor Heyerdahl, the explorer/adventurer who postulated that he could sail a homebuilt balsa wood raft over 4,000 nautical miles to prove a theory regarding Polynesian settlement, a theory that few took seriously, sent the following telegram to three of his friends.


All said yes.

The journey took 101 days not counting preparation time, the dramatic story is told in the book and documentary that takes its name from the raft itself, the Kon-Tiki. [If you seek out the documentary search for the unedited version which contains mind-blowing footage of the adventurers hand-fishing for sharks.]

I am going to ask you to read the telegram again.

Am going to cross the Pacific on a wooden raft to support a theory that the South Sea Islands were peopled from Peru. Will you come?”

If this were sent by a friend of yours, do you go?

If not, minus out 101 days, let’s cut the journey in half, do you go then?

If not, cut it to a third.

I mention this to highlight the difference between the extraordinary man that dreamt up such a plan, those equally adventurous who said “Yes,” and, well, us.

In casual conversation with many when I offer this scenario I am met with many valid reasons for why “I simply couldn’t go” family obligations job, etc.

I hear all of these, I do not discount them. I offer that these men who said yes had the same concerns and yet…

The conversation then becomes a bit of adventure-bargaining where we whittle down ambitions to “Well, I wouldn’t do that, but I would do this [insert substitution here.]”

At that point, I counter with, “Good idea, let’s plan that expedition.” And then suddenly we are back to “Well, I would but…”

Moving on…

The following advertisement was placed in a London newspaper by polar explorer Ernest Shackleton in, August 1914.]




Over 5,000 responded.

 One newspaper. We’re not talking world-wide distribution ala Kickstarter. One newspaper.

Any guesses as to how that ad plays today in a single newspaper?

How many responds to “small wages” and “safe return doubtful”?

Let’s read it again.

Men wanted for hazardous Journey. Small wages, bitter cold, long months of complete darkness, constant journey, safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in case of success.”

Do you respond?

I’m not certain that I do.

What I want to get at is, on one hand, we have a personal request from a friend to “Go do something.”

On the other we have a formidable request from a stranger that garners a large number in a small market.

I ask us to gauge this against our own experiences, our own sampling of human behavior today.

How easy is it to get somebody, anyone to go do anything today that is far less formidable than an uncharted ocean crossing or trek through the polar wilderness?

I have zero empirical evidence to back up my belief that we may be suffering from a deficit of human-grit, but I do have a large amount of personal experience that seems to suggest just that very thing.

Let’s ask ourselves---

Would any of these folks go?

·         Would we say “Yes” to our closest friend’s telegram?

·         Would we respond to Shackleton’s advertisement?

·         If not, what level of adventure would we say yes to?

Once we have our boundaries of where we would say “Yes, absolutely!” the next step is to plan that journey and send today’s version of a telegram or advertisement and see if any adventurers would like to accompany you.

If you get a “Yes” from no one, go anyway. Live your adventure. No one in the future is ever going to write an essay/article about a text reading “Thinking of going to Chili’s for lunch, wanna go?”

Grit is bigger than that.
[To indulge in grit, consider joining the RAW Crew.]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Warrior Awareness Drills by Mark Hatmaker

THE Primary Factor in self-protection/self-defense is situational awareness. Keeping in mind that crime is, more often than not, a product of opportunity, if we take steps to reduce opportunity to as close to nil as we can manage we have gone a long way to rendering our physical tactical training needless [that’s a good thing.]
Yes, having defensive tactical skills in the back-pocket is a great ace to carry day-to-day but all the more useful to saving your life or the lives of loved ones is a honed awareness, a ready alertness to what is occurring around you every single day.
Here’s the problem, maintaining such awareness is a Tough job with a capital T as most of our daily lives are safe and mundane [also a good thing] and this very safety allows us to backslide in good awareness practices. Without daily danger-stressors we easily fall into default comfort mode.
A useful practice to return awareness/alertness to the fore is to gamify your awareness, that is, to use a series of specific…

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner.
A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground.
The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level.
It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.]
For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down.
I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelling] starting at the top, t…

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “But what if…”


Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “but what if…” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.


The “but what if…” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “but what if…” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario.


Predator: Do what I say and I won’t hurt you.


Or, some other such promise to the victim.


Now, these sorts of …