Thor Heyerdahl, the explorer/adventurer who postulated
that he could sail a homebuilt balsa wood raft over 4,000 nautical miles to
prove a theory regarding Polynesian settlement, a theory that few took
seriously, sent the following telegram to three of his friends.
All said yes.
The journey took 101 days not counting preparation
time, the dramatic story is told in the book and documentary that takes its
name from the raft itself, the Kon-Tiki.
[If you seek out the documentary search for the unedited version which contains
mind-blowing footage of the adventurers hand-fishing for sharks.]
I am going to ask you to read the telegram again.
“Am going to
cross the Pacific on a wooden raft to support a theory that the South Sea
Islands were peopled from Peru. Will you come?”
If this were sent by a friend of yours, do you go?
If not, minus out 101 days, let’s cut the journey in
half, do you go then?
If not, cut it to a third.
I mention this to highlight the difference between the
extraordinary man that dreamt up such a plan, those equally adventurous who said
“Yes,” and, well, us.
In casual conversation with many when I offer this scenario
I am met with many valid reasons for why “I
simply couldn’t go” family obligations job, etc.
I hear all of these, I do not discount them. I offer
that these men who said yes had the same concerns and yet…
The conversation then becomes a bit of adventure-bargaining
where we whittle down ambitions to “Well,
I wouldn’t do that, but I would do this [insert substitution here.]”
At that point, I counter with, “Good idea, let’s plan that expedition.” And then suddenly we are
back to “Well, I would but…”
Moving on…
The following advertisement was placed in a London newspaper
by polar explorer Ernest Shackleton in, August 1914.]
Over 5,000 responded.
One newspaper. We’re
not talking world-wide distribution ala Kickstarter. One newspaper.
Any guesses as to how that ad plays today in a single
newspaper?
How many responds to “small wages” and “safe return
doubtful”?
Let’s read it again.
“Men wanted for
hazardous Journey. Small wages, bitter cold, long months of complete darkness,
constant journey, safe return doubtful. Honour and recognition in case of
success.”
Do you respond?
I’m not certain that I do.
What I want to get at is, on one hand, we have a personal
request from a friend to “Go do something.”
On the other we have a formidable request from a stranger
that garners a large number in a small market.
I ask us to gauge this against our own experiences, our
own sampling of human behavior today.
How easy is it to get somebody, anyone to go do
anything today that is far less formidable than an uncharted ocean crossing or
trek through the polar wilderness?
I have zero empirical evidence to back up my belief that
we may be suffering from a deficit of human-grit, but I do have a large amount of
personal experience that seems to suggest just that very thing.
Let’s ask ourselves---
 |
Would any of these folks go?
|
·
Would we say “Yes” to our closest friend’s
telegram?
·
Would we respond to Shackleton’s advertisement?
·
If not, what level of adventure would we say yes to?
Once we have our boundaries of where we would say “Yes, absolutely!” the next step is to
plan that journey and send today’s version of a telegram or advertisement and
see if any adventurers would like to accompany you.
If you get a “Yes” from no one, go anyway. Live your
adventure. No one in the future is ever going to write an essay/article about a
text reading “Thinking of going to Chili’s
for lunch, wanna go?”
Grit is bigger than that.
Comments
Post a Comment