Skip to main content

Ancient Hellene Frogmen & Combat Breath-Holding Tactics by Mark Hatmaker

A recent series of water-related tragedies reminds us of, at the very least, the vital importance of the ability to swim, and for the ready-warriors of the world an ability that goes a bit beyond that.

The mere ability to swim goes a long way in dire circumstances, not to mention the copious scientific evidence demonstrating the surprising ways human/water-interaction is not just exercise or fun [which it is] it is also therapeutic at a deep visceral level that is not yet well understood. [More on this fascinating research another day.]

Our ready warriors of the world might wisely embrace taking water-interaction a bit further. An idea we addressed at some depth in “Aquatic Evasion.

The ability to swim and the ability to swim under task load or under stress are two different things. Things well understood by our modern Navy SEALs and by all of the water-warriors that preceded them.

The ancient Greeks have numerous mentions of water warriorship in contemporary accounts as early as 400 B.C.E., but the one I’ll call your attention to today is Herodotus’ account of a man named Scyllias. In Book 8 of Herodotus’ Histories. He tells how Scyllias is engaged by the Persians, who were then at war with the Greeks. Scyllias’s task was to recover treasure from sunken ships.

His method of diving is not detailed but we can assume that he may have used the method provided in other Greek writings. These writings tell of Greek sponge-divers who used lead weights and ropes to speed descent and ascent.

Scyllias later defects to the Greeks and is employed against the Persians in a manner a bit more martial. He is tasked with long swims and dives to gather information about Persian ships and to cut their cables while underwater.

One must assume more than a little swimming, diving, and breath-holding prowess to accomplish any of these tasks. Add to that the stress of discovery or threat of death upon discovery and our mere ability to swim becomes a different animal.

Our early accounts do not provide specific information on the breath holding method, but we may surmise from the similarity of indigenous water cultures the world over that the method is mighty similar to the one that shakes out with modern free-divers.

I’ll shorthand that method here:

·        To increase breath holding facility for underwater work we have two processes to hack: Increasing available oxygen and decreasing CO2 signaling.

·        The urge to take a breath is fired first by the build-up of CO2 in the bloodstream, the actual need for oxygen is the secondary driver.

·        Extended breath-holding is facilitated more by hacking the first signal—CO2 blow-off.

·        Modern free-divers use the following method: Inhale for a 2 count, exhale for an 8-count then take a deep breath and commence your dive.

·        I have used this method myself to make 90 seconds easily and a bit beyond that with increasing discomfort as the seconds tick away.

This is an easy hack well within everyone’s ability.

But..consider this. The above method is for use in sponge-diving, sport, non-stressed recreational or vocational activities. Is this the same method that was or is used under duress?

US Navy Frogmen [precursors to the modern SEALs] circa. WWII era, took a slightly different approach, one that is anathema to the sport-approach.

In a nutshell:

·        The CO2 blow-off is cited as being the same driver to hack, but they approach the blow-off differently.

·        They recommend 10-17 rapid hyperventilating breaths [no more, no less] followed by a deep-inhalation taking the lungs to only ¾’s full.

·        As the break-point begins to approach, rather than give up immediately, begin letting out your breath slowly. This CO2 release eases the feeling of immediacy and prolongs breath holding time.

·        Using this method, I have likewise had easy extension to the 90 second mark and a bit beyond but…

Free-divers vehemently warn against using hyperventilation as it has proven inefficient and dangerous at depth—essentially our need to gasp may come sooner than with the relaxed 2-8 count ratio.

But consider this, there may be compelling reasons to the differences in approach.

The US Navy Frogman advice is only advocating breath holding to sailors and airmen who are:

ONE-Submerging against strafing fire.

TWO-Swimming beneath flaming oil slicks and other like dangerous post-shipwreck debris.

THREE-Stealth during river and stream crossings.

Notice that all three contingencies are stress-related endeavors. The warfare breath-holding method is likely canny wisdom for three-fold reasons.

ONE-Speed of use. When we see the strafing plane or other danger approach we may not have time to refer to the more leisurely 2-8 count ratio but can indeed fall back on the rapid 10-17 hyper-ventilating breaths.

TWO-The recreational/vocational method requires a calm operator. Conjuring calm in the midst of a car submerging beneath the waves after a bridge plunge might be a little out of the reach of most of us, whereas the hyperventilating may not be far from what we may naturally do.

THREE-The free-divers’ concerns are legitimate but, consider the uses of the warfare/danger evasion version. The warfare advice calls upon us to reflect on how far we are able to surface swim all out in 30-seconds. We are then to think of a like distance beneath the water with an extension to one minute in some cases.

In short, the recreational method is more about improving capacity for ever greater depths and duration, whereas the warfare method is about speed of use while under stress for short-duration sub-surface tasks.

Now, most of us will likely not be called upon to cut the cables from beneath Persian warships, or swim beneath masses of burning cargo, but for the snowball’s chance in hell that we may be called upon to escape or evade in an aquatic environment under stress, familiarity with both methods ahead of time [that means drilling and not mere reading] is the better part of wisdom.
[For more Old School training practices subscribe to this blog, the RAW Subscription Service and our upcoming book Rough & Tumble Conditioning.]


Popular posts from this blog

Warrior Awareness Drills by Mark Hatmaker

THE Primary Factor in self-protection/self-defense is situational awareness. Keeping in mind that crime is, more often than not, a product of opportunity, if we take steps to reduce opportunity to as close to nil as we can manage we have gone a long way to rendering our physical tactical training needless [that’s a good thing.]
Yes, having defensive tactical skills in the back-pocket is a great ace to carry day-to-day but all the more useful to saving your life or the lives of loved ones is a honed awareness, a ready alertness to what is occurring around you every single day.
Here’s the problem, maintaining such awareness is a Tough job with a capital T as most of our daily lives are safe and mundane [also a good thing] and this very safety allows us to backslide in good awareness practices. Without daily danger-stressors we easily fall into default comfort mode.
A useful practice to return awareness/alertness to the fore is to gamify your awareness, that is, to use a series of specific…

Awareness Drill: The Top-Down Scan by Mark Hatmaker

American Indians, scouts, and indigenous trackers the world over have been observed to survey terrain/territory in the following manner.
A scan of the sky overhead, then towards the horizon, and then finally moving slowly towards the ground.
The reason being that outdoors, what is overhead-the clouds, flying birds, monkeys in trees, the perched jaguar—these overhead conditions change more rapidly than what is at ground level.
It has been observed by sociologists that Western man whether on a hike outdoors or in an urban environment seldom looks up from the ground or above eye-level. [I would wager that today, he seldom looks up from his phone.]
For the next week I suggest, whether indoors or out, we adopt this native tracker habit. As you step into each new environment [or familiar ones for that matter] scan from the top down.
I find that this grounds me in the awareness mindset. For example, I step into my local Wal-Mart [or an unfamiliar box store while travelling] starting at the top, t…

Resistance is Never Futile by Mark Hatmaker

Should you always fight back? Yes. “But what if…”

Over the course of many years teaching survival-based strategies and tactics the above-exchange has taken place more than a few times. The “but what if…” question is usually posed by well-meaning individuals who haven’t quite grasped the seriousness of physical violence. These are people whose own humanity, whose sense of civility is so strong that they are caught vacillating between fight or flight decisions. It is a shame that these good qualities can sometimes stand in the way of grasping the essential facts of just how dire the threat can be.

The “but what if…” is usually followed by any number of justifications or pie-in-the-sky hopeful mitigations. These “but what if…” objections are based on unfounded trust and an incorrect grasp of probability. The first objection, unfounded trust, is usually based on the following scenario.

Predator: Do what I say and I won’t hurt you.

Or, some other such promise to the victim.

Now, these sorts of …